Author Archives: admin

U.S. Economy Undermined by Uncertainty

By Gary Palmer

Kevin Hassett, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, predicts that uncertainty about taxes and fiscal policy is likely to skyrocket by the end of this year. Hassett says the expiration of several tax cuts will result in significant pessimism about the American economy in the second half of 2012. This includes the tax cuts enacted during the Bush Administration, which are scheduled to expire December 31st.

From an individual/household perspective, allowing the cuts to expire will result in a tax increase of $494 billion in 2013, an unprecedented increase for one year. The average household tax bill will go up by $3,800 and will impact all income groups with middle- and low-income families hit the hardest. According to Curtis Dubay, a senior policy analyst with The Heritage Foundation, 70 percent of the increase will fall on middle- and low-income families. Dubay said, “That’s because 60 percent of the Bush tax cuts were for middle- and low-income taxpayers.”

The Washington Post called the looming tax increase “Taxmageddon,” and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke described it as a “massive fiscal cliff.” Jim Capretta, a former official with the White House Office of Management and Budget, predicts that the tax increase will result in an economy that is “… about one to two percentage points smaller than it otherwise would have been, and unemployment that’s a full percentage point higher than it otherwise would have been.”

While there still is time for Congress to take action to prevent this massive tax increase, it is looking increasingly unlikely that it will. With the uncertainty almost $500 billion in new taxes, individuals and businesses are reluctant to make major purchases or investments. Thus, the fear of “Taxmageddon” is already having a negative impact on our economy as families and businesses wait to see what Congress is going to do.

Members of Congress surely know that uncertainty has a negative effect on the economy. If businesses can’t predict next year’s tax rate, they are unlikely to invest in new equipment or expansion or to hire more workers. Individuals and families are less likely to spend as much for the same reasons.

Adding to the uncertainty is the explosion of new federal regulations on American businesses. Since January 2009, federal agencies have issued 106 major regulations that cost $46 billion per year. In 2009 and 2010 alone, federal agencies issued 7,076 rules. The Small Business Administration estimates that the regulatory burden on the U.S. economy is now at $1.75 trillion, more than twice the amount of individual income taxes paid by American households.

Three economists, Scott R. Baker and Nicholas Bloom of Stanford University and Steve Davis of the University of Chicago, produced an index of policy-related economic uncertainty and estimated its relationship to economic activity including investment and employment. This uncertainty index surges around major federal elections; events such as 9/11, the war on terror, the Lehman bankruptcy, and the TARP bailout; and the debt ceiling dispute that foreshadowed declines in private investment, industrial production, and employment. Interestingly, the index also spiked during the debate over the stimulus package.

Since 2000, policy uncertainty has been higher, on average, than in the previous 15 years. The spikes caused last summer by the contentious battle over raising the debt ceiling and Standard & Poor’s downgrade of the U.S. bond rating created uncertainty that the creators of the index believe helps explain the slower growth of the U.S. economy.

With the $494 billion tax increase on the horizon, economy-draining new federal regulations forthcoming, another debt limit vote set for the end of this year, and the most consequential election in decades, the uncertainty index will spike again. When the index spikes, the economy will suffer and for good reason … people and businesses don’t risk their money when the government works against their interests.

Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society.

Federal Government Will Dictate Pay, Tie Hands of Entrepreneurs Through “Paycheck ‘Fairness’ Act” (S.3220)…Senate Vote on June 5

On the afternoon of June 5th, there will be a U.S. Senate cloture vote on the motion to proceed to the so-called “Paycheck Fairness Act” (S.3220). SBE Council has joined a coalition of business allies in opposing the legislation. The following are some of their reasons:

  • The Act would impose unprecedented government control over how employees are paid at even the nation’s smallest employers.
  • This legislation could outlaw many legitimate practices that employers currently use to set employee pay rates, even where there is no evidence of intentional discrimination.
  • Common practices that a court could find unlawful under S. 3220 include providing premium pay for professional experience, education, shift differentials or hazardous work, as well as pay differentials based on local labor market rates or an organization’s profitability.
  • This level of government intervention in employee compensation is both unprecedented and unwarranted in the United States.
  • The threat the bill poses to small business is particularly troubling given the draconian penalties found in this legislation, which include unlimited damages regardless of whether a pay discrepancy was unintentional.
  • As The Washington Post editorial board stated in 2009, adding the Paycheck Fairness Act to these existing laws “risks tilting the scales too far against employers and would remove, rather than restore, a sense of balance.” In 2010, the Boston Globe wrote “the measure as a whole is too broad” and the Chicago Tribune described the bill as “grossly intrusive.”

    The legislation is all about political posturing in an election year, and will destroy jobs. There is nothing fair about imposing government command-and-control policies on small businesses. This backward and socialistic legislation takes away the business owner’s flexibility to reward their workforce based upon merit, experience, local labor market conditions and the firm’s ability to compensate based upon profitability, according to SBEC.

    Miracle Baby Declared Dead But Later Found Alive in Morgue 12 Hours Later

    Not a Single Democrat Voted in Favor of Ending FDA Raids on Raw Milk Farmers

    By Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

    Here’s some news for those who still somehow believe the political left in Washington cares about the People. After U.S. Senator Rand Paul introduced an amendment that would have ended armed FDA raids on raw milk farmers and legalized free speech about the curative properties of medicinal herbs, nutritional supplements and superfoods, are you curious how many Democrats voted in favor of this?

    Zero.

    Big fat zero, to be exact.

    Not a single Democrat in the United States Senate believes in fundamental food freedom, farm freedom or the principles of liberty. Every single Democrat in the Senate is a Big Brother sellout who supports the FDA having more guns pointed in the faces of raw milk farmers, arresting them and throwing them in prison, criminalizing real food and destroying America’s small family farms.

    Every single Democrat in the U.S. Senate believes that telling the truth about the beneficial effects of Chinese Medicine, or medicinal herbs, or nutritional supplements should be a crime that can also get you raided, shut down and imprisoned by the FDA. There is not a single Democrat who sees anything wrong with the government sending herbal product formulators to prison. There is not a single Democrat who believes that an Amish farmer has the right to milk a cow and sell that milk to their neighbor without being threatened by the government.

    This is an astonishing milestone in U.S. history. When those in Washington who pretend to represent the People openly and publicly vote to crush the very liberties and freedoms they claim to protect, you no longer have a real Democracy. You have a police state.

    The Republicans are only slightly better on this issue, by the way. Most Republicans also voted against this amendment. But there are 15 good guys who voted for it.

    To see who they are and to read the rest of the story, go to http://www.naturalnews.com/035977_farm_freedom_FDA_Senate.html. (See also Natural New’s article on Sen. Durbin’s anti-supplement bill.)

    “The Reason is Religion, Mom”

    Army Pvt. Naser Jason Abdo faced his mother during a visit in a Texas jail last July.

    Abdo had been arrested for plotting an attack on a restaurant in Killeen popular with soldiers from nearby Fort Hood. He would set off a bomb inside the restaurant, then shoot and kill as many survivors as possible as they scrambled out to safety.

    His mother asked the obvious question. Why?

    Jurors convicted Abdo for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and attempted murder after hearing and seeing the answer on video.

    “The reason is religion, Mom.”

    He had to act in response to American military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq. As a Muslim, he considered those affected by such actions to be family. “When bad things are happening,” he said, “you have to do something about it.”

    His mother couldn’t comprehend her son’s logic, to which he explained, “it may seem crazy from the outside, but it’s not.”

    Abdo’s reasoning echoes the justification offered by a series of attempted homegrown jihadists. If America is killing Muslims, the logic goes, Muslims must do whatever they can to stop it.

    Abdo chose Fort Hood as a target because that’s where Army psychologist Nidal Malik Hasan opened fire a year earlier, killing 13 people. Hasan reportedly shouted “Allahu Akhbar” as he opened fire, and had built a disturbing record of justifying suicide bombings and endorsing other radical ideas during his time in the service.

    Hasan had been in direct contact with American-born al-Qaida cleric Anwar al-Awlaki before the attack. Abdo carried copies of al-Qaida’s English-language magazine, Inspire, which included articles from Awlaki invoking theology in urging Muslims in America to wage attacks at home.

    “We as Muslims should seek the wealth of the disbelievers as a form of jihad in the path of Allah,” Awlaki wrote in one issue. “That would necessitate that we spend the money on the cause of jihad and not on ourselves.”

    Despite the self-professed motives, Islamist advocates argue that radical religious interpretations should not be discussed in assessing terrorist plots by Muslims. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) even conspired with a political scientist in 2010 to gin up sales of the professor’s book, which claimed that religious extremism was a minimal factor in suicide bombings.

    The group tries to pressure people out of discussing Islamic radicalism in general.

    In the wake of Hasan’s Fort Hood shooting spree, CAIR national spokesman Ibrahim Hooper told a radio interviewer that Hasan’s religious beliefs shouldn’t be considered as a factor. “He could have just snapped from some kind of stress. The thing is when these things happen and the guy’s name is John Smith nobody says well what about his religious beliefs? But when it is a Muslim sounding name that automatically comes into it.”

    A week after the massacre, when Hasan’s beliefs and contacts with Awlaki were well established, CAIR issued a press release arguing that those who did discuss religion were exploiting the tragedy to “promote hatred and intolerance.”

    And military leaders have shied away from the issue, omitting any reference to it in a report on Hasan’s Fort Hood attack. That drew a strong rebuke last year in a report by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

    “We are concerned that [Defense Department’s] failure to address violent Islamist extremism by its name signals to the bureaucracy as a whole that the subject is taboo,” the report said, “and raises the potential that DoD’s actions to confront radicalization to violent Islamist extremism will be inefficient and ineffective.”

    It is just as odd to see the Obama administration take pains to avoid even uttering the phrase “radical Islam,” opting instead for a generic “violent extremism.” Continue reading

    2012 AnthropoGraphia Human Rights Through Visual Storytelling Competition, June 15 Deadline

    Anthropographia is a volunteer-run non-profit organization that generates awareness of under publicized human rights issues through visual story telling. The volunteer board of directors and advisors consist journalists, photo journalists, professors of photography, and leaders in the multimedia industry.

    The Anthropographia Award for Human Rights gives photojournalists working in various communities and cultures opportunity to share their story or stories of witnessed human rights issues with an international audience.

    The Call for Entries for the 2012 Anthropographia Award for Human Rights is now open. This competition, which is free to all, offers an opportunity for photographers to exhibit their work and demonstrate their commitment to human rights issues.

    Submission deadline: June 15, 2012
    Opening of the exhibition in Montreal September 6, 2012
    Exhibition traveling internationally from mid-October 2012 to mid-July 2013

    For the 2012 edition of the Anthropographia Call for Entries, we will be selecting 12 photo-essays and 6 multimedia projects out of the entries submitted. These will be selected by a team of curators, including Matthieu Rytz, Founder of Anthropo-Graphia, and our 2 guest curators : Tina Ahrens – Co-Founder of emphas.is and James Estrin – senior Staff Photographer for the New York Times and co-editor of Lens. From the selected photo-essays and multimedia projects, two awards will be granted by the team of curators that recognizes the particular achievements of two photographers in representing human rights issues.

    These awards are:
    The Anthropographia Award for Photography and Human Rights
    The Anthropographia Award for Multimedia and Human Rights

    For more info, visit the Anthropographia website.

    Making Memorial Day Make a Difference

    By James Carafano

    As part of my teaching duties at West Point, I took cadets on a study tour of the World War II battlefields in Normandy, France. The first stop is the cemetery on the cliffs overlooking Omaha Beach. It is hard not to realize who pays the price for fighting for us. Walking the rows of crosses and stars of David is an unending repetition of private, infantry, private, infantry, private, infantry, sergeant, private, private …

    For the young cadets, it was a powerful lesson in leadership, a reminder that their decisions in battle were far weightier than the costs of their own lives. Every decision they made might add to the row, so no decision, no sacrifice should be taken lightly.

    For the rest of us, there is a lesson as well: Be thankful for the freedoms won–and who won them.

    Few topics in our society are more troubled than how a nation remembers. Few would dispute the practice to place flags on the memorials of the fallen–a tradition rooted in the post-Civil War practice called “Decoration Day.” Beyond that response, Americans are often never of one mind. Each generation has its own answer, and our expression of the value of service is shaped by many sentiments.

    When he commanded U.S. troops during the war with Mexico, General Winfield Scott returned with $150,000 paid by Mexico City on the threat of ransacking the capital. He extorted the money because it was the only way he could guarantee that his boys were taken care of. He used the money to pay the troops and buy supplies, and he offered the rest to Congress for an Old Soldier’s Home for homeless veterans.

    Conversely, when politicians looked at the 2 million Union veterans after the Civil War, they saw 2 million votes. Congress approved an overgenerous pension plan that quickly became mired in fraud, graft, and patronage until it absorbed 40 percent of the federal budget.

    After World War I, the doughboys came home from the horrors of mustard gas, machine guns, and aerial bombardment to find nothing waiting for them. While veterans earned a dollar a day in France, War Department employees received $12 a day at their comfortable desks, federal civil servants received $240 annual bonuses, and assembly line employees saw their wages double. The veterans got a Veterans’ Bureau run by a former presidential campaign worker who went to prison for corruption.

    Americans treated World War II veterans like the greatest generation. There were about 16 million men and women in uniform during the Second World War–the war touched every American family. We all cared.

    Those returning from Vietnam encountered a mixture of hostility and indifference. Even trying to build a memorial to the fallen in Washington, D.C., proved a protracted and heart-wrenching experience.

    Part of the problem is the temptation to wrap the experience of service members in a story: good war, bad war, love the troops, hate the war. We should honor the military for service and sacrifice regardless of our politics. And, we should not measure how we care according to what government does. Our service men and women are ours. They come from our community. What we do is the most important act of all.

    There are many organizations out there that honor the fallen and serve the families of those affected by loss. One worth noting is the Tragedy Assistance Programs for Survivors, or TAPS. Another amazing group is the Special Operations Warrior Foundation, which ensures that every child of a special operations warrior who falls on active duty has an opportunity for a college education.

    These are the kinds of organizations that make a difference. They honor the fallen by helping their families. They make us a better nation by showing us how to care–and what to do. They bring real meaning to Memorial Day.

    This article was first published in The Foundry by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., who is Deputy Director, The Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies and Director, Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.

    Memorial Day Remembrance

    In a recent Forbes article, Marianne Bickle reminds us of the true meaning of Memorial Day. She wrote,

    Memorial Day started as a holiday to remember the fallen during the Civil War. It was enacted as an honorable day of remembrance; time Civil War was the bloodiest and most deadly war experienced on our soil. Our new and fragile country was at war with itself.

    Actually, America was not new. A little under 100 years old America was more like a squabbling child among the nations. Other nations probably saw Americans as a bunch of warring siblings in need of providential correction.

    Americans are still divided and warring against itself. On one side are those who for the most part seek to live by the rules and on the other side are those who make up their own rule as the game of life is played out. Yes, those brats seem to be winning. The hand of Providence, however, always gets around to spankling the little darlings. (Oops! I didn’t mean that Providence actually stoops to violent acts like spanking; what I meant to say was meaningful discipline. Surely, God does spare the rod always preferring to lovingly negotiate.)

    Anyway, Bickle continued by reminding us that Memorial about honoring the fallen soldiers of all wars including the cultural war, the continuing struggle for human rights, and the daily sacrifice of those who protect society.

    Expanding the definition of Memorial Day, think about the men and women who put their lives on the line for our country. George Washington, Ben Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson were considered traitors by some. Rosa Parks and Harriet Tubman put their lives on the line to make advancements for human rights. Everyday fire fighters, police and military protect our country’s freedom and the safety of its citizens, never knowing if danger is a moment away.

    There are many unsung heros whose fight for our moral freedoms and security go unnoticed. Many of them faithful serve the needy society, teach us the way of right living, counsel peace, facilitate honest prosperity, advocate true justice, stand against corruption, deception and oppression. These often nameless people have or do suffered loss, slander and persecution for their service. For example, leaders who oppose gay marriage, abortion, or the advancement of Islamic law. Some have been killed for their service. Church workers killed by drug lords in the Bronx for helping children and others overcome the problems of poverity, fear, and addictions. The sacrifice and service of these Americans deserve our remembrance as well.

    Source: “The Meaning of Memorial Day,” Forbes, May 21, 2012.

    What Made Leaders of the Past Successful?

    By Peter Crawford

    The United States is in great need of great leadership. Many former American presidents and leaders implemented active industrial policy geared toward manufacturing at home, and these policies tended to work. There are inspiring examples of U.S. directorship on both sides of the aisle, and they go all the way back to the birth of our country. Since then, the most successful American leaders have made a point to protect American businesses first and foremost.

    During colonial times, British law was to arrest and jail anyone with manufacturing talent who relocated from Great Britain to the colonies. In response to this and several trade practices that impeded our ability to manufacture our own resources, economist and founding father Alexander Hamilton drew up steps to build up our own manufacturing – and begin our own country.

    Decades later, Abraham Lincoln decided against importing steel from England to build a transcontinental railroad. Instead, he decided to encourage development of our own steel plants. He put import restrictions on British steel thereby giving birth to one of the key industrial engines of growth in this country.

    In the darkest days of the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt developed a system of import quotas and subsidies for American agriculture. This system remains to this day and that same group of farmers now receives over $180 billion annually worth of subsidies.

    Dwight Eisenhower, in the mid-1950s, applied oil import quotas. John F. Kennedy produced the seven-point Kennedy textile program of restrictions on textile imports in 1961. Ronald Reagan put import quotas on steel, machine tools, semiconductors, and a 50-percent import tariff on motorcycles.

    We have seen plenty of successful leaders devise strategies that protected and strengthened the U.S. economy. They recognized that manufacturing at home empowers a nation and its companies. It is high time another one of these leaders appeared, as our current choices champion free trade agreements and the outsourcing of production and jobs. They are either uninterested or incapable of making such a change, and this is crippling the American people.

    This article was orginally published in Dublin, Ohio web publication Economy in Crisis on May 24, 2012.

    Greene County Safe Communities Promotes “Sharing the Road” During Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month

    Motorcyclist fatalities increased slightly in 2010 to 4,502, accounting for 14% of total fatalities for the year. This increase in motorcycle fatalities for the year resumes the unfortunate overall increasing trend over the last 13 years, an upward trend that saw only a single one-year decline in 2009, when 4,462 motorcyclists were killed. However, the greatest decrease in the estimated number of injured people is among motorcyclists, with an 8.9% decrease.

    In response to this increase, Greene County Safe Communities announced today that it is joining with other federal, state and local highway safety, law enforcement, and motorcycle organizations in proclaiming May as “Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month.” During this time – and during the rest of the year – motorists and other road users are reminded to safely “share the road” with motorcycles, and to be extra alert to help keep motorcyclists safe. Changing the driving habits of motorists and motorcyclists alike will help decrease the numbers of motorcyclist killed and injured in crashes. Motorcyclists are reminded to make sure that they are visible to motorists, and that they follow the rules of the road. All road users are reminded to never drive, ride, walk or bicycle while distracted.

    “As the weather improves, more and more motorcyclists are hitting the roads,” said Laurie Fox, Safe Communities Coordinator. “And with that in mind, pedestrians, bicyclists and drivers of all vehicles, including SUVs, passenger cars and trucks, need to be extra attentive and make sure they ‘share the road.’ A motorcycle is one of the smallest vehicles on our roads, often hidden in a car or truck’s blind spot. Every driver needs to aggressively look for them before changing lanes or merging with traffic.”

    Motorists and bicyclists should perform visual checks for motorcyclists by checking mirrors and blind spots before they enter or exit a lane of traffic, and at intersections. Pedestrians should also get into the habit of scanning for motorcyclists who might be hidden by other traffic.

    Ms. Fox reminds all road users that, “Motorcyclists have responsibilities, too. They should obey traffic rules, be alert to other drivers, never ride while impaired or distracted, and always wear a Department of Transportation-compliant helmet and other protective gear.”

    Ms. Fox said that a motorcyclist is much more vulnerable than a passenger vehicle occupant in the event of a crash. She said that research from DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shows that per vehicle mile traveled, motorcyclists are about 39 times more likely than passenger car occupants to die in traffic crashes.

    Ms. Fox offered tips for drivers to help keep motorcyclists safe on our roadways.

    • Remember, a motorcycle is a vehicle with all of the rights and privileges
    of any other motor vehicle.

    • Always allow a motorcyclist the full lane width—never try to share a lane.

    • Visually check for motorcycles by checking mirrors and blind spots
    before changing a lane of traffic.

    • Always signal your intentions before changing lanes or merging with traffic.

    • Don’t be fooled by a motorcycle’s flashing turn signal – motorcycle signals
    are often not self-canceling and riders sometimes forget to turn them off.
    Wait to be sure the motorcycle is going to turn before you proceed.

    • Allow more following distance – three or four seconds – when behind a
    motorcycle so the motorcyclist has enough time to
    maneuver or stop in an emergency.

    • Never tailgate. In dry conditions, motorcycles can stop more quickly than
    cars.

    • Never drive while distracted.

    Ms. Fox also said motorcyclists can increase their safety by:

    • Avoiding riding in poor weather conditions;

    • Wearing brightly colored protective gear and a DOT-compliant helmet;

    • Using turn signals for every turn or lane change, even if the rider thinks
    no one will see it;

    • Combining hand signals and turn signals to draw more attention to them-
    selves;

    • Using reflective tape and stickers to increase conspicuity;

    • Positioning themselves in the lane where they will be most visible to other
    drivers; and

    • Never driving while impaired.

    Our message to all drivers and motorcyclists is: Help to share in the responsibility of keeping all road users safe, and do your part by safely “sharing the road.”

    For more information on motorcycle safety, please visit http://www.nhtsa.gov/Safety/Motorcycles. For information on Greene County Safe Communities, please call 937-374-5669 or email lfox@gcchd.org.