Author Archives: admin

Access to Energy Reserves Could Change a Lot of Things

by Gary Palmer

For the last three years, the federal government has been in mad pursuit of green energy alternatives to redefine our economy and improve job markets. In the process, billions of taxpayer dollars were wasted on green energy companies that didn’t produce reliable alternative energy resources, economic growth or new jobs.

Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued thousands of pages of regulations that threaten existing energy producers with catastrophic fines and industry-killing regulations that smother the U.S. economy and force energy prices higher. Among these are regulations that are shutting down on coal-fired power facilities because power companies cannot afford compliance costs.

The resulting loss of 26,000 megawatts of coal-based power could power 20-26 million homes.

As the EPA continues its crusade, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission estimates that another 55,000 megawatts of coal-generated electricity will be shut down in the next six years. The loss of that much of our power grid combined with billions of dollars in new compliance costs will force American households to pay more for electricity at a time when the net worth of the average American household has declined by 40% since 2007.

Moreover, as a percentage of disposable income, energy costs hit lower-income households the hardest. In 2001, households earning below $50,000 annually were allocating 12 percent of disposable income to pay for energy. In 2011, households in that same income range spent 20 percent. Households with annual incomes between $10,000 and $30,000 spent 23 percent of their disposable income just to pay their energy bills, creating a significant burden for low-income elderly, black, and Hispanic households who are disproportionately in this income bracket.

In 2009, there were 25.3 million senior citizen households with median earnings of $31,354. Expanding access to America’s abundant reserves of oil, natural gas and coal would be of significant help to elderly Americans with fixed incomes. In many respects, it would be equivalent to an increase in Social Security benefits.

The United States has billions of barrels of recoverable oil that could jump start our economy, virtually eliminate our need to buy oil from hostile nations and reduce the cost of energy for all American households and businesses. According to the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management, there are 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil in the Green River Formation in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming with the richest deposits located in areas owned by the federal government.

The latest estimates from the federal government indicate proven reserves of over 280 trillion cubic feet of natural gas which is enough to meet the needs of the United States for 90 years. And U.S. coal reserves that are recoverable with current mining technology are sufficient to meet our needs for 249 years. When it comes to energy resources-oil, natural gas, and coal-the U.S. is one of the wealthiest nations in the world. The royalties from the federally-owned energy reserves would be in the trillions of dollars.

In other words, we are not broke, we are stupid.

Accessing federally-owned energy reserves must be a major part of our economic recovery plan. This will provide energy security not seen in decades as well as decrease energy costs for Americans who have seen their energy costs double over the last decade.

By allowing access to these reserves, the United States could become an energy exporter to major energy consumers like China and India. Over time, royalties would be in the trillions, some of which could be used to help ensure the viability of Social Security and Medicare.

New extraction technologies for recoverable energy resources will provide the opportunity to go from dependence on foreign energy to energy independence. Accessing these rich resources will be good for our national security and our economy and for elderly and low-income families whose disposable income is being depleted by high energy costs.

Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society.

Ohio Right to Life PAC Endorsements – Republican Ticket Plus A Few Democrats

The Ohio Right to Life Society and Political Action Committee today announced its endorsements of Ohio’s pro-life federal and state candidates for the November 6th general election.

“This election is the doorway into what could be the most pivotal period in our nation’s history,” said Mike Gonidakis on behalf of the Ohio Right to Life PAC. ”We personally urge every pro-life Ohioan to support these pro-life men and women, and trust them to lead our state and nation to a greater respect for life and religious freedom.”

These pro-life endorsed candidates include a diverse bipartisan group of men and women who Ohio Right to Life PAC is confident will represent the pro-life movement in our state and federal government. Ohio experienced never before seen growth in its defense of the unborn after electing every statewide candidate that Ohio Right to Life endorsed in 2010. With these victories, Ohio Right to Life worked with legislators to pass seven pro-life legislative measures, a feat unprecedented by any other General Assembly.

Notable endorsed candidates include:

  • Mitt Romney – President
  • Republican Josh Mandel – U.S. Senate
  • Republican John Boehner – U.S. House Congressional District 8
  • Justice Robert Cupp – Ohio Supreme Court
  • Republican Jim Renacci – Ohio Congressional District 16
  • Republican Sam Wurzelbacher – Ohio Congressional District 9
  • Republican Randy Gardner – Ohio Senate District 2
  • Republican Peggy Lehner – Ohio Senate District 6
  • Republican Chris Widener – Ohio Senate District 10
  • Democrat Mike Curtin – Ohio House District 17
  • Democrat Denise Driehaus – Ohio House District 31
  • Republican Kristina Roegner – Ohio House District 37
  • Democrat Matt Lundy – Ohio House District 55
  • Republican Rick Perales – Ohio House District 73
  • Republican Robert Hackett – Ohio House District 74
  • Republican Nick Skeriotis – Ohio House District 75
  • Republican Ron Hood – Ohio House District 78
  • For a complete list, click here.

    Rutherford Institute Files Habeas Corpus Petition in Federal District Court for Phoenix Man Jailed for Home Bible Studies

    PHOENIX, Ariz. — Attorneys for The Rutherford Institute have filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in the case of a Phoenix man who is serving a 60-day jail sentence and was fined more than $12,000 for using his private residential property to host a weekly Bible study, allegedly in violation of the city’s building codes. Institute attorneys are challenging the legality of Michael Salman’s imprisonment as a violation of his First Amendment and statutory rights to religious freedom and assembly, in addition to challenging the City’s assertion that if a person holds Bible studies or other forms of religious worship at his residence, he is required to comply with all local laws relating to an actual church that is open to the public. This latest filing comes after Institute attorneys petitioned the Arizona Supreme Court for habeas corpus relief, to no avail. Upon his eventual release from Lower Buckeye Jail, Salman will additionally be subjected to home arrest and random home inspections for allegedly violating his probation by continuing to hold Bible studies on his private property after being ordered not to have more than 12 people gathered on his property at any one time.

    “While Michael Salman should never have been charged with a crime for simply exercising his religious beliefs on his own property, to keep him in prison while the question of his basic rights is being considered is the ultimate injustice,” said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute. “The continued imprisonment of Michael Salman for simply worshipping God with his family and friends on his own property demonstrates the lengths to which government bureaucrats will go in service of imposing dubious regulations on average citizens.”

    Since 2005, Michael Salman and his wife Suzanne have hosted Bible studies for family and friends. However, after some neighbors allegedly complained about the gatherings, city officials got involved. In 2007, city officials ordered the Salmans to stop holding the Bible studies in their home, insisting that they were in violation of the zoning ordinance and construction code. The Salmans subsequently erected a 2,000-square-foot building in their backyard, large enough to hold approximately 40 people, which they proceeded to use for their weekly Bible studies. Attendees parked their vehicles on the Salmans’ 1.5 acre property. In June 2009, nearly a dozen police officers, accompanied by city inspectors, raided the Salmans’ property, searching for violations. Having determined that Salman’s weekly Bible studies constituted a church, city officials subsequently charged Salman with being in violation of various code regulations that apply to commercial and public buildings, including having no emergency exit signs over the doors, no handicap parking spaces or handicap ramps. Salman was later found guilty of 67 code violations. In coming to Salman’s defense, The Rutherford Institute is challenging the city’s assertion that “Bible studies are not allowed to be conducted in your residence or the barn on your property as these structures do not comply with the construction code for this use.” The Institute argues that Salman’s religious gatherings should have been treated as accessory uses under the regulations governing residential property. However, city officials claim that they can treat the Bible studies differently than family reunions, football parties or Boy Scouts solely because they are “religious worship.”

    World Congress of Families Leadership Letter Protests U.S. Embassy Participation in Prague “Gay Pride” Parade

    More than 120 pro-family and pro-life leaders from 11 countries signed a letter initiated by the World Congress of Families, protesting the U.S. Embassy’s participation in the Prague “Gay Pride” parade on August 18.

    Signers include a former President of the Southern Baptist Convention, a former Majority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, a former Arkansas Governor, the head of Torah Jews for Decency and the former Venezuelan Ambassador to the Vatican. (Click here for list of all signers.)

    The letter notes that the Obama administration has made promoting gay rights – including same-sex marriage – a foreign policy priority. If also observes the irony of those who complain ceaselessly about “cultural imperialism,” trying to force the worldviews of the American left on societies with traditional values.

    It further comments that: “The United Nations has never affirmed homosexual marriage or rights” and that the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights specifically says that “men and women…have a right to marry and found a family.” Family is described as “the natural and fundamental group unit of society” and, as such, “is entitled to protection by society and the state.”

    The Madrid Declaration of World Congress of Families VI (May 25-27, 2012) – unanimously adopted by more than 3,200 delegates from 72 countries – reads in part: “We affirm the natural family to be the union of a man and a woman through marriage for the purposes of sharing love and joy, propagating children, providing their moral education, building a vital home economy, offering security in times of trouble, and binding the generations.”

    The letter continues: “Regarding ‘gay rights,’ those caught up in this lifestyle have the same rights as other citizens. This does not include the ‘right’ to force others to validate a lifestyle they find objectionable, for religious or other reasons. It also does not include the right of men to marry men and women to marry women. The foregoing pseudo-rights do not advance human freedom and dignity but debase them.” (Click here to read the full text.)

    World Congress of Families Managing Director Larry Jacobs observed: “When the Czechs asked us to rally international support for the natural family, it was serendipitous. World Congress of Families I was held in Prague in 1997, with the support the Civic Forum and Michal Semin, who’s organized opposition to the Prague gay parade.

    New Analysis Of World Maternal Mortality Confirms Health Care, Not Abortion, Key Factor in Saving Lives

    Improved medical care, not abortion, is the solution to the problem of maternal deaths in the developing world, according to a new analysis of research from Chile and other sources. The analysis was released today at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in Geneva by Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life Global Outreach (MCCL GO) and National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund (NRLC), an NGO based in Washington, D.C. Leaders of both organizations called for a renewed emphasis on improving health care for women as the only sure means of reducing maternal mortality.

    “We have known for decades that most maternal deaths can be prevented with adequate nutrition, basic health care, and good obstetric care throughout pregnancy, at delivery, and postpartum,” said Jeanne Head, R.N., National Right to Life vice-president for international affairs and U.N. representative. “Yet some in the international community have focused their resources primarily on legalizing abortion at the expense of women’s lives.”

    “Our analysis presents clear, factual evidence to repudiate the claim that legalized abortion reduces maternal mortality,” said MCCL GO Executive Director Scott Fischbach.

    The analysis, “Women’s Health & Abortion,” compares the impact of improved medical care and legalized abortion on maternal mortality rates in several countries. Maternal deaths declined sharply in the United States through the 1930s and 1940s, for example, coinciding with advancements in maternal health care, obstetric techniques, antibiotics and in the general health status of women. This occurred long before the widespread legalization of abortion.

    Chile offers the most striking proof that maternal mortality is unrelated to the legal status of abortion. Chile sharply reduced its maternal mortality rate even after its prohibition of abortion in 1989, and now has the lowest maternal mortality rate in Latin America. Even maternal deaths due specifically to abortion declined—from 10.78 abortion deaths per 100,000 live births in 1989 to 0.83 in 2007, a reduction of 92.3 percent after abortion was made illegal.
    In the developing world, the danger of legalized abortion is profound, the analysis found. Ms. Head explains: “Women generally at risk because they lack access to a doctor, hospital, or antibiotics before abortion’s legalization will face those same circumstances after legalization. And if legalization triggers a higher demand for abortion, as it has in most countries, more injured women will compete for those scarce medical resources. The number of abortion-related maternal deaths may actually increase.”

    MCCL GO and National Right to Life called upon the WHA to focus its resources on the improvement of women’s health care in the developing world.

    “We urge the World Health Assembly to adopt measures to significantly reduce maternal mortality in the developing world by improving women’s health care,” Mr. Fischbach added. “We call upon the WHA to save lives, not expend endless energy and resources in areas where there is profound disagreement, such as the legalization of abortion.”

    Amnesty International Uses Maternal Deaths to Push for Unrestricted Abortion

    By Elizabeth Charnowski

    (New York – C-FAM) Amnesty International, a human rights organization that used to be abortion neutral, is now using the problem of maternal mortality to advocate for abortion. In a new report, ostensibly on medical care for maternal health, Amnesty calls on governments to repeal abortion laws and conscience protection for medical workers who may object. They also call for public health systems to train and equip health care providers to perform abortions.

    Amnesty’s “Maternal Health is a Human Right” campaign focuses attention on four countries: Sierra Leone, Burkina Faso, Peru, and the United States. Amnesty argues that maternal mortality will decrease if it is treated as a human rights issue, if costs to health care are covered by governments, and if a right for women to control their reproductive and sex lives is established.

    The United States’ maternal mortality ratio is only 21 deaths per 100,000 live births compared to Burkina Faso’s 300 and Sierra Leone’s 890 deaths per 100,000 births.

    The Amnesty’s report that in Sierra Leone, Burkina Faso, and Peru, that women face death because of inadequate medical conditions and corruption. But then the report goes further arguing that abortion is needed, too.

    Even though Amnesty says the United States has the best health care system in the world, the group urges that abortion services be expanded and obstacles eliminated, including what they call racial and cost barriers. They say abortion services are restricted for Native Americans and women on Medicaid since abortions are only paid for by the government in cases of rape, incest, or when the woman’s life is in danger. These women can still obtain an abortion, but it would not be covered by federal insurance.

    Amnesty takes issue with restraints on abortion, including conscience clauses and laws that allow health care providers and institutions to decline to commit an abortion if it is against their religious or moral beliefs.

    Elsewhere Amnesty has called for small steps towards the legalization of abortion. The group submitted a report to the UN Committee on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) calling for the legalization of abortion in Mexico for women who are pregnant as a result of rape or incest.

    According to its official position, “Amnesty International believes that where women’s access to safe and legal abortion services and information is restricted, their fundamental human rights may be at grave risk.”

    At the time Amnesty changed its position, many long-time Catholic supports left the group and at least one Vatican Cardinal called upon Catholics no longer to support the group. In the intervening years Amnesty has become an aggressive public campaigner for a right to abortion and even makes the claim that abortion is a human right in international law.

    Elizabeth Charnowski is a Blackstone Intern, a wonderful program of the Alliance Defending Freedom, at the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM). This article was originally published in Friday Fax, an internet report published weekly by C-FAM,a New York and Washington DC-based research institute (http://www.c-fam.org/).

    Why Would We Celebrate Congressmen Mike DeWine, Dave Hobson and Steve Austria?

    by John Mitchel

    I just received my invitation to the Greene County Republican Party picnic; the theme,
    “A tribute to our 7th Congressional District Congressmen.” Really?! Now here are three
    career politicians who never met a budget deficit they didn’t like; never voted against
    raising the debt ceiling; advanced NAFTA, GATT, China’s entry into the World Trade
    Organization and the unconstitutional Fast Track trade negotiation authority for the President,
    and worst of all, enthusiastically supported unconstitional, undeclared wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
    that gained nothing, but cost the U.S. beyond comprehension in terms of blood, sweat and tears
    for generations to come.

    The simple truth is DeWine’s, Hobson’s and Austria’s legacy doesn’t go past their success at
    bringing back pork to their special interest insiders. And if you disagree, all you need to do is
    take a look at the new Ohio congressional district map. Steve Austria is soon gone, as is the 7th
    District. Greene and Clark counties, the two counties that did the heavy lifting in the Seventh
    at election time for more than 25 years, have been swallowed up by the 10th and the 8th.

    If this is success worth celebrating, how would you define failure?

    Greene County Traffic Fatalities Update

    The Greene County Safe Communities program reports that as of July 24th, 2012, there have been a total of eight (8) traffic fatalities in Greene County. This compares with a total of eleven (11) traffic deaths for the entire year of 2011.

    The top five (5) causes for the majority of these crashes that have resulted in death and/or injury in Greene County are following too closely, failure to yield, failure to control, improper lane change and distractions (i.e. cell phone use/texting). These deaths, while tragic, and injuries sustained were all preventable. Please…park your phone, avoid all distractions, drive sober and obey all traffic signs and signals. The Safe Communities coalition will continue to work with schools, businesses and the general public to provide educational materials and information to keep Greene County citizens safe on the roadways.

    The safety of our Greene County residents while they are traveling on the roads is our biggest concern. As we are now on the backside of summer, heading into the fall and winter months, Safe Communities would like to remind all drivers to buckle up, park your phone and drive responsibly or secure a designated driver. Someone cares about you and your life is worth saving!

    The Safe Communities program was developed to help communities decrease traffic injuries and deaths, increase safety awareness, decrease the amount of money spent on traffic-related injuries, and increase the number of people involved in keeping communities safe.

    The next meeting of the Greene County Safe Communities Coalition is Wednesday, September 26th, 9 a.m. at the Greene County Combined Health District in Xenia with a presentation from MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) on “The Power of Parents”. The public is welcome to attend. For more information, contact Laurie Fox at 937-374-5669 or email lfox@gcchd.org.

    Dismal Economy, Real Growth Policy Needed

    by Raymond J. Keating

    There’s no other way to put it: The latest GDP numbers from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis were bad.

    During a recovery, real U.S. GDP growth should be moving along at 4.0%-4.5%, on average. But during the second quarter, real GDP advanced by a mere 1.5%. That followed on 2.0% growth during the first quarter.

    And for the past three years, from the time this so-called recovery started, real GDP growth has averaged a mere 2.2% – half of where we should be.

    By the way, it needs to be pointed out that business investment is slowing. As noted in the GDP data, gross private domestic fixed investment continued a three-quarter slowdown – from 15.5% in the third quarter 2011 to 10% in the fourth, 9.8% in the first quarter 2012 and 6.1% in the second quarter. This is important to watch since consumers – indeed, the rest of the economy – take their cue from business investment. After all, if business is expanding, consumers gain in confidence, especially given the effects on the job market.

    Two key problems exist with our persistently bad economic growth numbers.

    The first is the loss in production, income, and jobs. Slow economic growth, quite simply, means a loss in our standard of living.

    Second, the U.S. has to make sure that it does not fall into the trap of diminished expectations. After GDP numbers were released on July 27, a talking head on television said the U.S. economy was “resilient.” Really?

    Continually poor GDP numbers for four-and-a-half years can have an effect on people’s psyches. They can start thinking that poor economic growth is the new normal. That is, they can succumb to diminished expectations. Suddenly, 2.0% economic isn’t so bad.

    Make no mistake, the U.S. should not accept poor economic growth as some kind of new normal. Instead, if we make serious pro-growth policy changes, no reason exists why the U.S. cannot get back on a path of robust growth.

    The necessary policy agenda to spur entrepreneurship, investment, growth and job creation forward is no mystery.

    Provide broad-based, substantial, permanent tax relief. Similarly, roll back egregious, costly, anti-growth regulations, and establish a regulatory system whereby Congress must approve all new rules and regulations. Rein in the size and scope of government spending in order to leave resources for far more productive uses in the private sector, now and in the future. Lead the world in reducing trade barriers in order to expand opportunity. And get the Federal Reserve refocused on the only job it’s meant to do, i.e., maintaining price stability.

    Get the policy mix right, and the U.S. will get back on a track of strong economic growth and job creation.

    Raymond J. Keating is chief economist for the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council. His new book is “Chuck” vs. the Business World: Business Tips on TV.

    Pastor On Trial for Helping Mother & Daughter in Same-Sex Custody Battle Travel Internationally

    by Wendy Wright

    A judge orders that a little girl be taken from her mother and given to a lesbian woman with whom the little girl has no biological ties or relationship.

    An Amish/Mennonite pastor is on trial for allegedly, and perhaps partially unknowingly, helping the mother and daughter travel to another country.

    Yet homosexual advocates say that same-sex marriage or unions don’t affect anyone other than the individual couples.

    The trial of Pastor Kenneth Miller began this week in Vermont. He is accused of helping Lisa Miller (no relation) leave the U.S. in 2009 for Central America with her then-7 year old daughter Isabella.

    As with many custody cases, there are many details and twists and turns. This story is replete with state officials allowing another state’s same-sex civil union laws trump their own laws upholding traditional marriage.

    Years ago, Janet Jenkins and Lisa Miller, both of whom lived in Virginia, entered into a civil union in Vermont. Lisa had Isabella through the aid of a fertility clinic. Soon after, Janet and Lisa broke up. The mother and child lived in Virginia, where Lisa became a Christian and renounced her former ways. Janet lives in Vermont.

    A few years later, a custody battle ensued in Vermont. Virginia does not recognize same-sex marriage or unions. That state has both a constitutional amendment and a state law only recognizing traditional marriage.

    Yet judges in Virginia defied those laws and incomprehensibly ruled that Virginian citizens Lisa and Isabella must obey Vermont’s laws and court rulings.

    A Vermont judge had ordered that Lisa hand Isabella over to Janet Jenkins for unsupervised days-long visits.

    Isabella had returned from these visits with this virtual stranger recounting episodes that left her not wanting to go back, like being required to bathe with Janet. Soon after Lisa and Isabella disappeared, the judge – to punish Lisa for not producing Isabella for a visit – gave full custody to Janet.

    The case has become a cause celebre for homosexual activists with the New York Times on the trail of Lisa and Isabella. The newspaper recently ran a story on an Amish/Mennonite community in Nicaragua where the mother and daughter had lived for a time as the FBI and Interpol conducted an international manhunt. They sought the pair, claiming Lisa “abducted” her daughter.

    The New York Times reported this week on as the trial began against Kenneth Miller who prosecutors accuse of driving Lisa and Isabella from Virginia to New York in 2009, where they crossed into Canada to then fly to Central America.

    A website set up by supporters to follow Pas. Miller’s case can be found at Millercase.org

    As they state, “When considering the correct response in this case, we take inspiration from Jesus’ way of relating to people in whatever situation they were in – that is with compassion and lack of condemnation . . . We wish to clarify that this was an act of mercy without a political agenda.”

    This article was originally posted on the Turtle Bay and Beyond blog by Wendy Wright, who is Vice President for Government Relations and Communications at the Catholic Family & Human Right Institute.