Category Archives: economy

New High: 93% Say They’re Paying More for Groceries Than A Year Ago

Americans nationwide continue to lose faith in the Federal Reserve Board to keep inflation under control, with the number who say they are paying more for groceries now at an all-time high.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of American Adults shows that just 31% are at least somewhat confident that the Fed will be able to keep inflation under control and interest rates down, and that includes only eight percent (8%) who are Very Confident. Sixty-five percent (65%) are not confident the Fed can keep inflation and interest rates under control, with 25% who are Not At All Confident.

Prior to the latest survey, overall confidence in the Fed to handle inflation and interest rates ranged from a low of 32% to a high of 41%. The number who hold no confidence at all is now at its highest level in nearly two years.

This lack of confidence stems partly from the fact that 93% of adults report paying more for groceries now than they did a year ago, the highest finding to date. Only four percent (4%) say they’re not paying more for groceries now compared to a year ago. Prior to the latest results, the number that said they are paying more for groceries ranged from low of 75% in April 2010 to a high of 91% in May of this year.

Seventy-nine percent (79%) of adults now expect the amount of money they spend on groceries to be higher a year from now, up five points from last month and just a point below the highest level measured. This number stayed in the low to mid-60s throughout 2009 and 2010.

Only three percent (3%) think they’ll be spending less on groceries in a year’s time, while 15% expect to pay about the same amount.

For the third straight month, 79% of adults are at least somewhat concerned about inflation, including 49% who are Very Concerned. Only 19% aren’t as concerned about inflation, with just four percent (4%) who aren’t concerned at all.

Democrats hold more confidence in the Fed to keep inflation under control and interest rates down than do Republicans and adults not affiliated with either major party.

Investors are slightly more confident than non-investors that the Fed can handle both of these matters.

But strong majorities of adults from all demographic groups agree they are paying more for groceries now than they were a year ago.

These findings add to a string of survey findings showing very negative perceptions of the economy among Americans.

Ohio Left Behind

Last week was the beginning of a sales tax holiday for nearly 34% of all states. Those states include Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma,South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia with Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, and Texas to soon follow.

Notice, Ohio is not among those states enjoying the sales tax holiday. Why?

I’m pretty sure there are a lot of Ohio parents who would appreciate not contributing an additional 7% or so for sending their children back to schools with new clothes and school supplies. After all, a state that makes parent pay taxes for schools, for school supplies, and for school lunch programs at gun point could at least give them a tax holiday during this important season.

Mid-Year Report Shows Small Businesses Struggling

Washington, D.C. – The National Small Business Association (NSBA) today released its 2011 Mid-Year Economic Report which shows that, despite a few bright spots including measured growth in past and projected hiring, America’s small businesses have diminishing confidence in both the U.S. economy and the future of their own firms.

“Eighty-eight percent of small-business owners anticipate a flat or recessionary economy in the coming year, the highest it’s been in two years,” stated NSBA President Todd McCracken. “This negative economic outlook is causing a growing lack of confidence among small-business owners.”

Contrary to a more positive outlook back in December, 45 percent of small businesses today—up from 40 percent—said they expect no growth opportunities whatsoever in the coming year. Thirty-six percent of small businesses report an inability to garner adequate financing, and 19 percent—up from 13 percent six months ago—are paying credit card interest rates of 20 percent or higher. The rising cost of health care continues to plague small businesses with nearly one third reporting they held off on hiring a new employee due to those costs.

When asked which issues are most important for policymakers to address, small businesses ranked reducing the national deficit, reducing the tax burden, reigning in the costs of health care reform and regulatory reform their top priorities.

“Nearly one in three small-business owners named the growing U.S. debt the number one challenge facing their business,” stated Larry Nannis, CPA, NSBA Chair and shareholder at Levine, Katz, Nannis + Solomon, P.C. “Lawmakers ought not downplay the ramifications of the ongoing deficit debate—and lack of a long-term solution—on America’s small-business owners.”

Although the general sentiment of the small-business community is one of concern and economic uncertainty, there were a few somewhat positive developments. Small businesses reported modest gains in employment resulting in the lowest net decrease in employment in three years. Furthermore, there was an increase in the number of small businesses that projected hiring in the coming 12 months.

Since 1937, NSBA has advocated on behalf of America’s entrepreneurs. A staunchly nonpartisan organization, NSBA reaches more than 150,000 small businesses nationwide and is proud to be the nation’s first small-business advocacy organization. For more information, go to www.nsba.biz.

Debt Crisis Agreement Reached, More Work Ahead

By U.S. Representative Steve Austria

On Monday, the House passed the Budget Control Act with a vote of 269 to 161, and the President signed it into law on Tuesday. This is a solution that addresses our debt ceiling without giving the President a blank check and invitation for reckless spending, and reins in future spending by Washington.

While everyone agrees this is not a perfect plan, I want to commend Speaker Boehner for adhering to the principles of cutting current spending, reforming future spending, and moving toward a Balanced Budget Amendment – and doing so without raising taxes on hard-working American families. Additionally, this solution helps bring certainly to our markets, giving small businesses across the country more confidence to invest in their businesses and start creating jobs again. Perhaps most importantly, the past few weeks have proved that we are changing the way business is done in Washington.

I would like to share with you some of the specifics in the bill and how it particularly adheres to the principles for which I was fighting for to cut current spending, cap future spending, and balance the budget. First of all, the bill immediately cuts $917 billion of spending while allowing for an extension of the debt limit for only six months. It then creates a Joint Committee of Congress that must propose additional spending cuts of at least $1.2 trillion by November 23, 2011 before any additional increases to extend the debt limit past February 2012. The proposal will be put before both Chambers of Congress for a vote. If Congress does not pass the recommendations of the Joint Committee, or the President does not sign their recommendations into law, Congress then can either pass a Balance Budget Amendment to the states or can make automatic across-the-board spending cuts, totaling $1.2 trillion, which will be enacted through a procedure called sequestration (please note that civilian and military pay, veterans benefits, Social Security, and Medicaid are exempt from these automatic spending cuts).

All of this is done without raising taxes on small businesses. This was a critical stipulation of the bill because raising taxes on hard working families and our job creators during difficult economic times will do more harm than good.

Over the past few months, the House worked tirelessly passing three separate bills to address our debt crisis: first the Cut, Cap and Balance Act, then the Boehner Plan, and then the Budget Control Act, which served as the framework for the final bill. Unfortunately, the Senate did not pass a single bill of their own and the President only offered a speech without a real plan. As was pointed out during the debate, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) could not put a price tag on speeches. Throughout this entire process Republicans worked tirelessly to create a solution that embodies the principles of cutting spending, capping future spending, and balancing the budget.

As a member of the Appropriations Committee and with four military installations in my district, I raised serious questions about the impact any defense cuts could have on our military. Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has stated for months that “our national debt is our biggest national security problem.” Both Chairman Young of the Defense Appropriations Committee and Chairman McKeon of the Armed Services Committee in the House have said that we can live within the means of this budget framework, and voted in favor of the Budget Control Act.

While some cuts to defense and national security programs are predicted, the spending decisions for these programs will come through the Appropriations Committee, and as a member of this committee I will do all that I can to ensure that our men and women serving bravely in the military have the necessary resources to carry out their missions. Furthermore, I will continue to work to reverse the wasteful Washington spending that has plagued families and small businesses in Ohio.

After years of out-of-control federal spending, this bill – although not perfect – is a step in the right direction toward paying down the debt and working to ensure that our children and grandchildren enjoy the same standard of living that we do. We must start by cutting up the credit card that the federal government has been using with reckless abandon.

Raising Debt Limit Pushes Voters to Frustration Limit

By Gary Palmer

While Republicans and Democrats have thus far accomplished nothing in regard to the debt limit, one thing they have succeeded in doing is raising the frustration limit for millions of Americans.

American voters are accustomed to political drama and gamesmanship in Washington and, for the most part, have largely ignored it at election time. The emergence of the Tea Party movement in April 2009 was the first evidence that voters were fed up enough to organize against the political establishment in both parties. This new level of frustration among voters was displayed by the impact of the Tea Party in the 2010 election.

So while Congress and President Obama have failed to do anything about the debt limit, recent polls indicate they have certainly succeeded in raising the public’s frustration limit to an all-time high. New polling data now indicates that deadlock over the debt limit and the failure to enact sensible cuts in government spending have turned public opinion against Obama, as well as the Democrats and the Republicans in Congress.

The Pew Research Center poll released on July 28th reported that only 41 percent of all registered voters say they want Obama to be re-elected, a ten-point drop since May. Among critical independent voters, there has been a steep drop-off in support for him, with only 31 percent supporting his reelection. In fact, among independent voters, a generic Republican candidate holds an eight-point advantage.

Public frustration is even worse when it comes to Congress.

According to a July 27th Gallup daily tracking poll, 41 percent approve of the way Obama has handled the negotiations to raise the federal debt limit, while only 31 percent approve of the way Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner has handled it and only 23 percent approve of Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s efforts. In fact, the only good news for Republicans is that even at 48 percent, Boehner’s disapproval rate is lower than the 52 percent disapproval rating of the President and Harry Reid. Interestingly, only 36 percent of Democrats approve of Reid’s handling of the debt limit.

For most voters, there are two things on their minds-excessive government spending and jobs. The outcome of the debate over raising the debt limit affects both. If the debt limit is raised without spending cuts, the U.S. could see its AAA bond rating reduced. This will cost the federal government about $100 billion more in interest costs each year, plus it will also increase the interest costs for consumer credit and mortgages and inflict even more stress on our economy.

According to David Beers, Standard & Poor’s government credit ratings expert, there is a 50-50 chance of a downgrade in our bond rating if there is not a serious agreement on cutting spending. But Obama and the Democrats have thus far refused to agree to any debt limit increase that includes major spending cuts without a major tax increase along with the cuts. They want to add over a trillion dollars in taxes which will further undermine the ability of the economy to create new jobs.

In other words, the Democrats are holding the economy and the nation’s credit rating hostage until their demands for a massive tax increase are met. The problem for the Republicans is that they have been outmaneuvered and are in a lose-lose situation. If they don’t raise the debt limit, the economy will take a hit and the U.S. credit rating could be lowered. If they do raise the limit and don’t get substantial spending cuts in the deal, the economy and credit rating could still take a hit, and politically they will get hammered by their conservative base.

Thus, it appears that both parties and the President have put political gain ahead of what is best for the country despite potentially catastrophic consequences for the American people and even for the financial markets and economies of other nations. In the process, the unfavorable ratings for Obama and both the Democrats and Republicans in Congress are climbing higher by the day.

The truth is that this debacle is the fault of both parties. Both parties have recklessly spent not only our money, but borrowed money as well. And now the American people are reacting with a continuously level of frustration that may not reach its ceiling until the 2012 elections.

Politicians in both parties should take note that campaigning on the hope that voters are only slightly less fed up with your party than they are with the other party is not exactly something incumbent congressmen should hang their political hats on.

Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society.

NIA Exposes Debt Ceiling Truth

National Inflation Association (NIA) hasn’t written about the whole debt ceiling issue over the past few weeks because in our minds it is completely irrelevant. Our elected representatives in Washington along with the mainstream media have been wasting thousands of hours of time and hundreds of millions of dollars debating a topic that has no meaning at all. The President, Senate, and House of Representatives are putting on a show to make it look like they care about cutting spending and balancing the budget. Except for a select few elected representatives like Ron Paul who care about protecting the U.S. Constitution and preserving what little purchasing power the U.S. dollar still has left, every other politician in Washington is putting on a complete charade in order to trick their constituents into believing there is a difference between the proposals from the Republicans and Democrats.

While our incompetent and corrupt mainstream media has been proclaiming there are major differences between the two bills proposed by House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, NIA believes John Boehner might as well be a Democrat and Harry Reid could easily pass himself off as a Republican. There are absolutely no meaningful fundamental differences between Boehner’s plan that was approved by the House of Representatives yesterday evening, before being killed by the Senate two short hours later, and Reid’s bill, which was just rejected by the House today in a pre-emptive vote before the Senate even had a chance to vote on it.

Both bills are estimated to reduce the U.S. budget deficit by approximately $900 billion over the next 10 years. Of the $900 billion only about $750 billion are actual discretionary spending cuts with the rest being an expected reduction in interest payments on the national debt as a result of either bill passing. When you have an unstable fiat currency that is rapidly losing its purchasing power and could collapse at any time, it is impossible to accurately project what our budget deficits will be 5 or 6 years from now, let alone 9 or 10 years from today. As far as the next two fiscal years are concerned, both proposed bills from Boehner and Reid are estimated to only cut spending by a total of about $70 billion in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 combined. Continue reading

A Responsible and Innovative Budget for Ohio

By State Representative Jarrod Martin

With a budget gap of $8 billion this year, the Ohio House has fought to put Ohio on more stable financial footing by crafting a sustainable, responsible budget. With innovative solutions that will lead to long-term stability for our state, we reexamined the size and scope of state government, invested in the things that matter, and did not raise taxes on Ohioans.

One of the priorities in this budget was Ohio’s education system. Nothing affects the future stability of a state as much as the education of its young people. We significantly expanded options for parents regarding which schools their children can attend. Additionally, the General Assembly has ensured that all school districts in Ohio receive at least what they received in state aid last year, which will maintain a quality educational structure for our children.

We also ensured that more Ohioans have access to our state’s higher education institutions as well. The Legislature fought to keep tuition at a more affordable level by capping the annual increases at 3.5 percent. We also included a provision to allow our state’s high school graduates who leave Ohio to return within a set time frame and receive in-state tuition.

An ongoing priority for the Ohio House is job creation and Ohio’s business climate, and this was reflected in the biennial budget. We aimed to attract more people to Ohio by eliminating the state’s death tax starting in 2013. This unfair and unnecessary double tax has compelled Ohioans to flee to other states to retire, farm and build their businesses without the hindrance of the state taking more from them. It also has contributed to Ohio’s notoriously burdensome and anti-business tax climate, which this Legislature is committed to rectifying during this General Assembly.

We also worked to strengthen Ohio’s businesses through the creation of InvestOhio, which allows Ohioans who make an investment in one of Ohio’s small businesses for two years to receive a tax credit of 10 percent. Not only does this encourage up to $1 billion in new, job-creating investments for the next two years, but it also encourages additional investment down the road. With healthy businesses in Ohio, there are more jobs for our communities.

To protect the most vulnerable in our communities, the Legislature allocated $31.3 million in fiscal year 2012 and $63 million in fiscal year 2013 over the executive budget for PASSPORT, which provides a home-care option for seniors. We also allocated an additional $7.5 million for mental health services.

This General Assembly has been entirely focused on getting our state in order and providing a brighter future for all Ohioans. Your phone calls, e-mails and letters continue to help my work in the Statehouse by keeping me informed and guiding my decision-making in Columbus. If you have other ideas for getting Ohio back on track, I may be reached by calling (614) 644-6020, e-mailing District70@ohr.state.oh.us, or writing to State Rep. Jarrod Martin, 77 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215

Stop Gov. Kaisch from Selling Roads to the Highest Bidder

Don’t let Governor Kasich sell or lease the Ohio turnpike. Why should we pay foreigners for the privilege of riding on our own money-generating highway system that we built and paid for? It is currently earning approximately $250 million a year for Ohio. We would only gain a one-time infusion of additional money to pay current bills that your kids and future generations will be paying for many years to come.

This sale has major functional problems. Previous sales in other states have lessened their ability maintain and care for their roads and has prevented them from implementing needed expansion. This has also curtailed their ability to make proper decisions that affect local businesses.

We will have inadequate control of future toll increases. Indiana mistakenly sold their toll road system to a foreign company. Drivers complain that the prices have doubled over 5 years. The cost to travel the Ohio turnpike today is $15; in just 5 years time your cost could be $30 or more!

Tell Governor Kasich Ohio is NOT for sale!

The U.S. Isn’t Broke

By Gary Palmer

Despite what you have heard from the politicians in Washington and from the hand-wringing media about whether or not to raise the debt limit, the United States is not broke. Our nation has abundant assets; we simply refuse to use them.

As sensible as the Cut, Cap and Balance Act that just passed the U.S. House of Representatives may be, it should be obvious that with Republicans only in control of the House, there is practically no chance of getting it passed by the Democrat-controlled Senate and signed by the President as part of a deal to raise the debt limit. In fact, the Democrats, along with President Obama, are insisting any legislation that includes spending cuts must also include substantial tax increases to raise federal revenue.

In an already weak and stagnant economy, the last thing we need is a major tax increase that would further slow an economic recovery. What the nation desperately needs now is legislation that will help get our economy growing again.

Consequently, what the Republicans should be pushing for in exchange for raising the debt limit is passage of legislation that will authorize the sale of oil and gas leases on federal land as the means to raise federal revenue. In other words, if Obama and the Democrats want to raise revenues, they should get it out of the ground instead of out of our pockets.

According to the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management, there are 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from oil shale in the Green River Formation. This is three times more than the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. The Green River Formation covers about 11 million acres in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, with about 80 percent of the recoverable oil in a 1,225 sq. mile area of western Colorado.

The federal government owns or manages 73 percent of the lands that contain significant oil shale deposits in the West and 80 percent of the recoverable oil in the Green River Formation. In addition, there are several billion barrels more offshore. In fact, only about 15 percent of the U.S. coastal waters have been opened to exploration. Including the known oil reserves in Alaska and other areas of the nation, the U.S. has oil reserves worth trillions of dollars.

And that is just the oil reserves. The U.S. has an estimated 284 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas. Together, it is estimated that there are enough oil and natural gas reserves on federal lands alone to power 65 million cars for 60 years and heat 60 million households for 160 years. In addition, the U.S. has 261 billion tons of coal that is recoverable using current mining technology, enough to last 249 years.

Opening some of these reserves for recovery would provide the federal government with additional revenue, hundreds of thousands of jobs to our economy, less U.S. dependence on foreign oil, lowered energy costs to help make U.S. businesses more competitive, and lowered household energy costs for utilities and gasoline. It is estimated that just allowing permits for offshore exploration and drilling to return to levels before the BP spill, including approval of backlogged permit requests, would generate 400,000 jobs and add $45 billion to GDP over the next two years.

Lowering energy costs would have a tremendous effect on household incomes, particularly for low income families. Americans are now spending 12 percent of their household income on higher energy costs for gasoline, electricity and heating. Since 2002, the household energy costs have more than doubled, rising from $2,180 per year to $4,410. Households with incomes below $50,000 annually, which is half of all U.S. households, are estimated to be spending 20 percent of their disposable income on energy costs; households with incomes less than $30,000 are spending 23 percent.

The federal government is actually adding to our debt problem by providing payments to states to help low-income households pay their rising energy costs. As of April 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services has spent almost $3.9 billion thus far in the current fiscal year on subsidies to help low-income households pay their energy bills, including $58.3 million in Alabama.

If the Obama Administration and the leadership of the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate insist that any agreement to cut spending must be coupled with higher revenues, then the Republicans should put revenues from oil, natural gas and coal reserves on the table.

Given the enormous amounts of revenue that could be generated, opening up these reserves should be part of a common sense solution on the agenda of every member of Congress who truly cares about the American people. This would generate direct revenue from royalties and add hundreds of thousands of new jobs, generate billions in tax revenues for state and federal government, add hundreds of billions of dollars to the GDP over the next ten to 15 years and provide significant relief from high energy costs for millions of low- and middle-income households and for senior citizens on fixed incomes.

If members of Congress are looking for a way to ease the political pain of raising the debt ceiling, tying the increase to reducing energy costs and boosting an economic recovery would be a great way to do it while also continuing the fight for spending cuts.

Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society.

Dealing with the Debt Limit

By Representative Steve Austria

With the national unemployment reaching 9.2 percent recently, it is clear that the borrowing and spending policies of this Administration have not worked. Since January 2009 took office, the national debt has increased by $3.7 trillion. And now, our federal treasury has literally reached its limit. With the debt ceiling limit set to be reached August 2, I am working tirelessly with my Republican colleagues to pass a bill that will ensure the federal government remains open and pays its bills and obligations. Earlier this year I joined my colleagues in voting NO to raising the debt ceiling when it was offered as a standalone bill as we should not be giving out a blank check that puts the tab on our children and grandchildren. As the negotiations continue, there must be three structural changes within the compromise: 1) the spending cuts must exceed the debt limit; 2) we must cut up the credit card and stop the egregious Washington borrowing and spending; and 3) we must do this all without increasing taxes on hardworking Americans and job creators.

I have long-opposed this Administration’s spending spree and huge expansion of government in our lives, which in the past 18 months has included the $2 trillion government takeover of health care, the $1 trillion “stimulus” package, and countless “bailouts.” I have supported putting our country back on a Path to Prosperity by helping our job creators and I support the efforts to balance the budget.

It is time to take America in a new direction. Right now, Republicans control the House of Representatives, which is only 1/3 of the federal government, but we are committed to representing the American people. And for our families in the 7th District of Ohio, I know times are tough, but please be assured that I will continue to work to reverse the wasteful Washington spending that has plagued families and small businesses in Ohio.