Category Archives: Ohio

Effects of Federal Tax Cuts on Small Businesses

By Congressman Steve Austria

In the past month, I have talked with many small business owners across the 7th Congressional District – from farmers to manufactures to members of our local chambers of commerce. Each has questioned and voiced their concerns regarding the temporary tax cuts put in place in 2001 and 2003 that will expire on January 1, 2011 if Congress does not take action.

If Congress allows the tax cuts to expire, it will equate to a $3.8 trillion tax increase that will affect all taxpayers. With the numerous taxes already imposed in legislation ushered through by current Congressional leadership, the last thing Ohioans need right now are further tax increases. In particular, small businesses – which produce 70 percent of new U.S. jobs – will see a direct impact that will affect their ability to create and sustain area jobs.

Specifically, if the tax cuts are not extended the individual income tax rates will increase across the board. Not only does this take money out of the wallets of all taxpayers, but many small businesses are taxed by this rate as well. This increase could be detrimental to those businesses that are already facing difficulties in obtaining credit and meeting payroll.

In addition, if no action is taken the federal estate tax will be reinstituted. This tax disproportionately affects small businesses and family farms. Many times, upon the death of an owner, small businesses are forced to sell to pay this tax and jobs are lost.

The indecision surrounding this issue is causing uncertainty for our local businesses who are seeking assurance in these difficult economic times. Congress needs to make the tax cuts permanent including the estate tax, capital gains tax and dividends tax to assist in creating an environment of confidence and encouraging local entrepreneurs to invest in their businesses creating long-term, sustainable jobs.

Beyond permanently extending the tax cuts, Congress needs to stop the spending. According to a recent U.S. Census Bureau report, federal domestic spending increased by 16 percent to $3.2 trillion in 2009. This does not include any interest paid on foreign debt. If we don’t stop the spending and let Americans keep more of their hard-earned money we won’t be able to turn the economy around.

The Hosptial Tax

By State Representative Jarrod Martin

As you may be aware, Ohio faces incredibly important fiscal decisions as an $8 billion budget deficit looms in the next year. With 10.5 percent of Ohioans unemployed and thousands of jobs lost in the past 12 months alone, it is important that lawmakers in Columbus be focused on finding long-term solutions to our state’s budget problems.

House Bill 1, the biennial budget for 2010-2011, included a new hospital franchise fee, which raised taxes on our health care sector. According to the Ohio Hospital Association, this fee will generate approximately $718 million for the state.

Approximately $575 million of the new hospital franchise fee will be reimbursed to hospitals. To correct the disparity between these two figures, Ohio’s hospitals are responsible for about $150 million in new fees. This new responsibility has caused many of Ohio’s hospitals to cut jobs, reduce services, or delay expansion projects.

Hospitals are an important presence in Ohio, as they are among the top employers in the state. They represent a growing sector within the economy at a time when this sort of economic expansion is scarce. As a growing sector, hospitals also generate crucial economic activity. In fact, they are one of the major drivers of Ohio’s economy and provide much-needed jobs for many communities.

The new hospital franchise fee attempts to balance the state’s budget by drawing from Ohio’s hospitals. The goal is to decrease the deficit, but the consequences of this tax must be noted. It has the potential to affect job creation efforts and the welfare of Ohio’s families for years to come.

I am concerned that this hospital tax will not be an effective way to raise revenue for the state. It creates a palpable strain on the health care system. In addition, it adds pressure to Ohio’s taxpayers, as it asks them to take on the duty of balancing the budget.

As a solution, Representatives Terry Boose and Troy Balderson have introduced House Bill 497, which aims to minimize the hospital franchise fee. The proposed bill would subtract the cost of uncompensated care from the tax base, as well as Medicare and Medicaid costs. It would also reduce the tax base from 1.61 to 1.5 percent. These courses of action would follow the recommendations from the Ohio Hospital Association.

By relieving hospitals of taxes on the free services they provide, hospitals could save millions of dollars. This money saved could be used to pay their employees, renovate facilities and maintain stellar service to Ohioans. Ensuring a consistently outstanding health care system promotes the well-being of both the citizens of Ohio and the state’s economy. House Bill 497 is a step in the right direction toward rebuilding our economy and making Ohio a great place to work, live and raise a family.

Cost of Government Day and Ohio

Ohioans worked 230 days before their portion of government spending and debt was paid. The national average was 231.6 days, according to the Cost of Government Day report.

“The calculation of Cost of Government Day for each state is based on the varying government burdens suffered in each state. Federal tax and spending burdens are also a large contributing factor. These federal burdens vary because relatively higher burdens are borne by states with relatively higher incomes. State and local tax and spending burdens vary as well.”

“In recent years most states increased taxes to continue their spending extravaganzas during the economic downturn.” The Cost of Government reported state tax increases since 2003 based on the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO). Ohio earned the honors of the state with the 9th highest tax increases. Since 2003, Ohio taxes increased over $13.2 billion. That means the average tax increase for every Ohio citizen was $1,140.98.

“Unfortunately, state lawmakers’ penchant for tax hikes has shown no sign of abating this year: FY 2010 net tax increases across the U.S. total $23.9 billion. As governors and legislators have learned that tax increases are political losers that lead to a loss of business, jobs, residents, and economic growth, they have started to search for less visible ways to acquire revenues that keep them from being forced to cut spending.” Some examples of less visible means of taxation include increasing fees, increasing sin taxes, etc.

As might be expected, taxpayers have been looking to escape the burden of increasing taxes. Migration to states with lower taxes is reportedly the preferred strategy.

“Several studies, including the American Legislative Exchange Council’s “Rich States, Poor States,” and past reports by the Americans for Tax Reform Foundation have documented the movement of taxpayers from high tax to low tax states in recent years.”

“These studies present compelling evidence that taxes are the single largest factor in interstate migration, compared to factors such as climate, employment, family relocation, etc.”

Using Internal Revenue Service data, the report shows that “the ten states with the highest tax burden lost over 3 million residents from 1998 through 2008. These residents took with them a staggering $92 billion in income”.

“During the same period over 2.3 million migrants moved to the states with the lowest tax burden, bringing more than $97 billion with them.”

“In addition to higher levels of emigration, higher tax states also maintain higher unemployment rates, placing an expanding tax burden on a shrinking tax base. It is unsurprising, then, that the top five highest-tax states consistently have about a 0.5 percent higher unemployment rate than the five states with the lowest tax burden.”

“States that attempt to raise taxes to balance their budgets encourage their most productive citizens to find more welcoming homes. They also discourage productivity, as taxpayers get to keep less of what they earn in high-tax states. Worst of all, increased taxes provide government with the permission it needs to grow by sustaining the bloated spending of irresponsible state governments. Absent significant changes in their tax-and-spend schemes, these high tax states will soon find themselves without a populace to support the extravagant costs of living in those states.”

I still wonder if allowing casinos to operate in Ohio will do much to lessen the tax burden. In the long run, I the negative social impact of related crime and wrecked families will likely prove the cost was greater than the benefit.

A more responsible approach would have been to cut more unnecessary programs instead of threatening those programs most needed for the most vulnerable in order shame those who still possess a moral conscience.

Nevertheless, the report presented one positive development. In 2009, Ohio ranked 31st among the 50 states in terms of number of days worked to pay for national spending. This year, Ohio was ranked 27th. This means citizens worked fewer days to pay for the Empire’s spending spree than they did last year.

Hoo Rah!

Kudos to Austria for Supporting Ohio Project’s “Heath Care Freedom Amendment”

Kudos are due Austria for his support of The Ohio Project’s grass root effort to place a constitutional amendment on the November ballot. He was in the act of signing their petition at a recent outing, which is posted on the Ohio Project website. His public display of local patriotism may have been a vote-getting ploy. Nonetheless, along with his legislative opposition to Obamacare, his local patriotism deserves mention.

The Ohio Project amendment is titled The Health Care Freedom Amendment .It will prohibit federal and state governments from enforcing the federal mandate making individuals purchase health care. It also prohibits government from criminalizing those who do not or who purchase health care outside of the federal insurance pools.

Thus far, the Ohio Project has gathered the required petition signatures in 46 counties. Greene County is among those counties where 5% of voters have signed the petition. What is now needed is 5% more to meet the 10% state ballot requirement. Greene County has until the end of September.

Serbert Gluckian (Xenia) and Steve Rogers (Fairborn) were taking petition signatures at their business offices. If interested, you could e-mail Gluckian at saguckian@ameritech.net or Rogers at steverogers@allstate.com to see if they are still doing so.

To learn more about the Amendment, go to the Ohio Project website

Ohioans ready for Big Fixes

On July 28, the Buckeye Institute released a statewide poll of 1,800 registered voters that shows Ohioans are at odds with their government leaders on the major issues of the day, especially regarding government compensation, regulations, and Ohio’s pro-union policies. Magellan Data and Mapping Strategies of Broomfield, Colorado, conducted the poll on July 19, 2010, via an autodial survey of registered voters from across Ohio. Because of the large sample, the survey has a margin of error of 2.31%.

Here are some top-line numbers:

·    50% think government leaders should first reduce government worker
     compensation to eliminate the $8 billion budget state deficit;

·    Only 16% think taxes should be increased to eliminate the Ohio deficit;

·    52% think Ohio’s state and local taxes are too high;

·    56% think Ohio’s regulatory environment makes it harder for businesses to
     create jobs and grow;

·    85% think workers should be free to choose whether to join a labor union to get      jobs;

·    67% think we should stick with coal or add nuclear and natural gas energy.

Source: Buckeye Institute Reports, August 9, 2010.

Statewide Poll of 1,800 Registered Voters Shows Ohioans Ready for Big Fixes

The Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions today released a statewide poll of 1,800 registered voters that shows Ohioans are at odds with their government leaders on the major issues of the day, especially on government compensation, regulations, and Ohio’s pro-union policies. Magellan Data and Mapping Strategies of Broomfield, Colorado, conducted the poll on July 19, 2010, via an autodial survey of registered voters from across Ohio. Because of the large sample, the survey has a margin of error of 2.31%.

Here are some top-line numbers:

· 50% think government leaders should first reduce government worker compensation to eliminate the $8 billion
budget state deficit;
· Only 16% think taxes should be increased to eliminate the Ohio deficit;
· 52% think Ohio’s state and local taxes are too high;
· 56% think Ohio’s regulatory environment makes it harder for businesses to create jobs and grow;
· 85% think workers should be free to choose whether to join a labor union to get a job; and
· 67% think we should stick with coal or add nuclear and natural gas energy.

Other than for government workers who think cutting compensation and cutting services are equally appealing, every other demographic group chose cutting government compensation as the top choice to cut the deficit. Except for one group, every demographic group thinks Ohio’s taxes are too high by a majority or plurality.

On Ohio’s regulatory environment, every demographic group by a majority or plurality feels our regulations make it harder for businesses to create jobs and grow. The most stunning result is that all demographic groups support a worker’s freedom to choose whether or not to join a union to get a job with all but five groups polling at over 80 percent. A whopping 93% of Republicans, 87.7% of Independents, and 77.2% of Democrats want workers to have the freedom to choose.

Buckeye Institute President Matt A. Mayer noted, “It is clear Ohioans believe that business as usual is not sustainable. As always, common sense Ohioans are ahead of the politicians. I hope our elected officials follow the people and don’t just say, but do the right thing to get Ohio growing and prosperous again.”

Cincinnati Public Schools Blocked from Discriminating Against Charter and Private Schools

The 1851 Center halted Cincinnati Public Schools’ (CPS) efforts to suppress competing charter and private schools with an important victory in Hamilton County Common Pleas Court.

In CPS v. Conners, Judge Robert P. Ruehlman ruled CPS’ policy of prohibiting already sold and unused public school buildings from being used as private or charter schools violated state law. The 1851 Center litigated the case on behalf of the Theodore Roosevelt School, a Cincinnati charter school, and its owner Dr. Roger Conners, who was sued by Cincinnati Public Schools on the eve of the school’s August opening.

Dr. Conners purchased an unused school building located in Cincinnati’s Fairmount neighborhood, where all CPS schools are in academic emergency, and 80 percent of families are of minority status and live in poverty.

CPS sued to enforce a deed restriction prohibiting the use of previously-taxpayer-owned school buildings for use by a charter or private school. The 1851 Center asserted such a restriction is void by Ohio’s public policy in favor of school choice, and cheats taxpayers of sales revenue from the buildings. The court agreed.

In his ruling, Judge Ruehlman called CPS’ deed restrictions “anti-competitive.” The judge asserted CPS was merely attempting to suppress competition from charter and other alternative schools, and thwart school choice for the parents and children of Cincinnati.

On July 6, Judge Ruehlman denied Cincinnati Public Schools’ desperate last-ditch effort to derail Theodore Roosevelt School’s opening, denying CPS’ Motion to Stay. This clears the way for the school to open in August. Area families have already enrolled over 200 children. The school will employ approximately 40 people.

A Public Records Request by the 1851 Center revealed that CPS has already paid its hand-picked law firm over $32,000 in Cincinnati taxpayers’ money for the case, at an average rate of approximately $200 per hour, and at times as much as $256 per hour.

This is quite a sum, considering that Dr. Conners only paid $30,000 for the school building. Moreover, the 1851 Center offered CPS an opportunity to settle before it initiated the litigation against Dr. Conners it eventually lost. The amount spent by CPS does not include the fees to be paid for the pending appeal.

Source: 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, July 22, 2010

Ohio Republicans Ask Gov. Strickland to Stop Abortion Funding in Health Care

In the wake of a dustup last week that saw pro-life groups uncover how the Obama administration planned to fund abortions in new high risk health insurance programs created by the new federal health care program, Republicans in Ohio have asked Gov. Ted Strickland to make sure there is no funding.

Ohio’s Republican congressional delegate today wrote a letter to Strickland asking him to ensure Ohio does not go down the same road as Pennsylvania, New Mexico and Maryland.

The National Right to Life Committee uncovered how those three states planned to use federal taxpayer dollars for abortions, and now the Obama administration has promised that will not happen.

The signers acknowledged the new promise to make sure the high risk pools cover only abortions allowed under the Hyde Amendment.

However, since the amendment does not apply to the new health care program Obama signed into law, they asked for Strickland to make sure Ohio doesn’t fund abortions since their is no formal prohibition of it in place federally.

“We are urging you to assure Ohioans that the final plan our state will submit to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services will not include elective abortion as a taxpayer-funded benefit,” they write in the new letter, according to a report in The Hill.

Their letter went on to say: “Furthermore we respectfully request that you direct the Ohio Department of Insurance to thoroughly review its negotiations with the third-party provider your administration designated to run Ohio’s high-risk pool plan to ensure that the use of federal funds to perform abortions is clearly and definitively prohibited under any coverage.”

House Minority Leader John Boehner signed the letter along with Reps. Steven LaTourette, Patrick Tiberi, Jean Schmidt, Michael Turner, Jim Jordan, Robert Latta and Steve Austria, The Hill indicated.

Source: LifeNews.com, July 19, 2010.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid OKs Additional Payment to Ohio Hospitals for Medicaid Expenses

After lobbying from Gov. Ted Strickland, officials at the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services have given the go-ahead to a state plan to pay hospitals an additional $87 million this year for the care they provide to low-income Ohioans on Medicaid (Source: “Feds OK plan to let hospitals recoup Medicaid expense,” Columbus Dispatch, July 15, 2010).

The bulk payment, which will be disbursed to hospitals by the end of this month, and a 5-percent increase in Medicaid reimbursement fees effective in October were included in last year’s state budget to let hospitals recoup some of the money they were losing through a new state franchise fee.

The fee is projected to cost hospitals statewide $718 million over the two-year budget ending June 30, 2011. The two provisions aimed at offsetting that expense will let hospitals recoup $569 million, according to the Ohio Hospital Association.

Source: Ohio Health Policy Review, July 16, 2010.

Rep. Steve Austria on Blue Ribbon Commission

It is important now, more than ever, to focus on how our region can be more competitive and bring additional jobs to Ohio. This week,  I joined members of the Blue Ribbon Commission at a meeting held at Wright State University. I appointed the commission to examine how local companies and universities can better position themselves to win more contracts, create more jobs and support Wright Patterson Air Force Base, one of the largest single site employers in the state. It is made up of a broad cross-section of talented and energetic community leaders who have extensive experience both inside and outside the fence, including business leaders and individuals in academia.

When the commission was formed, members were tasked with submitting their recommendations for increasing the number of contracts awarded to local companies, in turn creating more private-sector jobs in the area that can be sustained for years to come. They were asked to look into a wide variety of issues including identifying any impediments to local companies and determining the best business model to receive contracts.

The commission has completed its work and identified 18 specific ways we can enhance regional economic opportunities through partnerships with the business community, academia and government in the Dayton area. John McCance, who is retired Air Force, and Gary Kowal, who has several years of experience in defense contracting, served as co-chairs of the Blue Ribbon Commission and presented the commission’s findings, conclusions and recommendations to the public. Some recommendations highlighted in the report include,

* Utilize social media (a website, or collaborative networking site) to house centralized information to include such items as a calendar of events; detailed information on government requirements; prime/sub contractor opportunities and links to related informational sites.

* Leverage the region’s engineering capabilities and skill base to accelerate subcontractor opportunities with large defense contractors who are involved in the research, development and manufacture of weapon systems acquired by WPAFB.

* Publish the “Corporate Development Education Framework” as a tool to help beginning, intermediate and advanced businesses assess their government contracting maturity and identify areas for improvement.

* Establish a centralized electronic capability for local area businesses having service, R&D, manufacturing, and other capabilities to provide detailed information about their qualifications, capacity and contact information and have it indexed by product and service.

* Encourage the State of Ohio and local governments to support a program, similar to the State of Utah, which provides funded support in the areas of opportunity assessment, strategy, proposal development, contract negotiations, capture and program support.

* Provide access to additional resources and training in the area of proposal writing and preparation.