Category Archives: business

Economy, Washington Are Hindering Small Business Growth, Survey Finds

The Small Business Outlook—a nationwide survey of more than 900 small business owners—found that 84% of small businesses think the United States is headed in the wrong direction, and 83% think the national economy is on the wrong track. Some 87% of the respondents think Congress is standing in the way of economic growth and progress, while 75% feel the president is standing in the way.

“What we’re hearing is that small business wants Washington to get out of the way, and they want more certainty,” said Bill Miller, senior vice president of Political Affairs and Federation Relations at the Chamber. “Uncertainty is a significant impediment, and small businesses are reluctant to get into the game until they know what the rules are.”

Read the rest of this article in the Free Enterprise Magazine.

SBE Councils “Business Tax Index” Ranks State Tax Systems

The Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (SBE Council) published its “Business Tax Index 2011: Best to Worst State Tax Systems for Entrepreneurship and Small Business.” The index ranks the 50 states and District of Columbia according to the costs of their tax systems for entrepreneurship and small business.

Raymond J. Keating, chief economist for SBE Council and author of the report, said: “Higher taxes have an impact on a state’s competitiveness. There is a reason why low tax states are better able to attract investment, and ‘Business Tax Index 2011’ helps to shed light on the tax burdens that are affecting the decisions of individuals and businesses. In many states, elected officials continue to propose tax increases – and actually raise them – in order to fund out-of-control government spending. High levels of spending translate into increased tax burdens on the entrepreneurs and investors who drive economic growth and job creation.”

SBE Council’s “Business Tax Index 2011” pulls together 18 different tax measures, and combines those into one tax score that allows the 50 states and District of Columbia to be compared. Among the taxes included are income, capital gains, property, death/inheritance, unemployment, and various consumption-based taxes, including state gas and diesel levies.

Keating added: “State and local taxes affect the decisions made by entrepreneurs, investors, businesses and individuals. Several states in recent years have hiked taxes in response to excessive government spending, and declining revenues in a down economy. In high-tax states, elected officials have refused to cut spending or slow its growth. The implications for entrepreneurship, small businesses, competitiveness, investment and employment are significant.”

According to the “Business Tax Index 2011,” the 15 best tax systems are: 1) South Dakota, 2) Texas, 3) Nevada, 4) Wyoming, 5) Washington, 6) Florida, 7) Alabama, 8)Alaska, 9) Ohio, 10) Colorado, 11) South Carolina, 12) Mississippi, 13) Oklahoma, 14) Virginia, and 15) Missouri.

The 15 worst state tax systems are: 37) Illinois, 38) North Carolina, 39) Nebraska, 40) Connecticut, 41) Oregon, 42) Rhode Island, 43) Hawaii, 44) Vermont, 45) California, 46) Maine, 47) Iowa, 48) New York, 49) New Jersey, 50) Minnesota, and 51) District of Columbia.

SBE Council President & CEO Karen Kerrigan added: “The path is pretty simple for elected officials that want to attract investment, encourage small business growth and create jobs. Keep taxes low, and get spending under control. In several states – particularly those that are making headlines such as Ohio and Wisconsin – the Governors are working to do just that, and these states will reap the benefits of their sound approach. A competitive tax system will help small businesses grow, and allow each state’s economy to thrive.”

Higher Energy Prices Dominate Legislative Activity

With higher gas prices undermining small business growth and potentially the economic recovery, various approaches addressing the issue are being pursued in the U.S. House and Senate.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) Senate Majority Leader Reid will open floor debate this week on the Democrats’ bill to raise taxes on the largest oil/gas companies. As the Congressional Research Service has reported, hiking energy taxes will only translate into higher prices and less supply. SBE Council adds “fewer jobs” to the list of ills. So, raising energy taxes will increase business costs even more as SBE Council President & CEO Karen Kerrigan noted at a May 9 media briefing at the National Press Club.

“Proposals that hike energy taxes are unthinkable given the fragile state of the economy. Small business owners continue to struggle with weak sales while their business costs tick higher. Raising taxes on energy will exacerbate uncertainty, and the real challenge that many small businesses face in regard to their ability to compete in and survive the tough economy. Higher energy taxes mean higher costs for small businesses, and it’s irrational for Washington to inflict more pain on our nation’s struggling entrepreneurs,” said Kerrigan. SBE Council has urged the Senate to reject these tax hike proposals and focus on solutions that increase supply and will help make energy costs more affordable.

“Washington needs to pursue and enact policies that promote business confidence, investment, certainty and growth for small businesses – indeed for all sectors and industries,” said Kerrigan. “Policies that encourage energy exploration and development, while promoting investment, will lead to a more reliable supply and lower energy prices. Raising energy taxes is the wrong approach.”

Meanwhile, over in the House, SBE Council is supporting two pieces of legislation that will be voted on this week. SBE Council sent letters to all members of the House communicating support for H.R. 1229, “Putting the Gulf Back to Work Act” and H.R. 1231, “Reversing President Obama’s Offshore Moratorium Act.” Both of these bills will help move energy policy in a positive direction by encouraging domestic exploration and development, which will bring more certainty to energy supply and foster affordability. For the thousands of small business owners and millions of employees whose livelihoods are tied to a vibrant energy sector, these two bills are also critically important.

The latest SBE Council Energy & Entrepreneurs analysis reviews why some politicians are pursuing vindictive policies against the energy sector in light of recent profit reports. “As sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, no doubt existed as to what the reaction would be in certain political circles to recent reports on oil industry profits,” SBE Council chief economist Ray Keating writes. He sorts out the politics, the policies and the economics in the piece “Bonus Resource: Why Gas Prices are Rising – Let’s Investigate,” by SBE Council’s Keating.

U.S. Tax System Ranks Poorly on PWC’s Paying Taxes 2011 Report

by Scott A. Hodge, Tax Foundation

Were the U.S. to get its own headline from the recently released Paying Taxes 2011 – a joint product of PriceWaterhouseCoopers, the World Bank, and the International Finance Corporation – it would be “The U.S.: where it is moderately easy to pay relatively high corporate taxes.”

That is hardly the kind of marketing slogan that will bring investors flocking to do business in the U.S.

The report ranks 183 economies on the compliance and tax burden faced by a standard firm with 60 employees. The compliance burden is broken down into three indicators: the ease of paying taxes; the number of tax payments a firm must make; and the time it takes the firm to comply. The tax burden (called the Total Tax Rate TTR) measures the percentage of profits going to pay not only the income tax, but any sales taxes, labor taxes, and mandatory contributions a firm might pay.

When it comes to the ease of paying corporate taxes and the time it takes to comply with them, the U.S. ranks 62nd and 66th respectively out of the 183 economies. Not terrible, but not great either. By contrast, Canada ranks 10th best in ease of paying and 34th best in the amount of time wasted. The U.S. does rank a bit better (35th) when it comes to the number of tax payments a firm must make. Canada, however, ranks 15th.

The U.S.’s Total Tax Rate of 48.8 percent gives it a below-average ranking of 124th. The world average TTR was 47.8 percent while the average rate among EU countries was 44.2 percent. Closer to home, Canada ranked 37th overall, with a TTR of 29.2 percent.

The factor that boosts the U.S.’s TTR the most is our profits tax, which totals 27.6 percent of profits. In Canada, by contrast, the effective tax rate on profits is 9.8 percent, whereas in France the rate is 8.2 percent, in Germany 22.9 percent, and in the United Kingdom it is 23.2 percent.

The current talk of fundamental tax reform, especially cutting the U.S. corporate tax rate, is a welcome sign of the growing recognition that our tax system is undermining our global competitiveness. Hopefully, the talk will soon turn to action.

Boeing vs. the NLRB: A Naked Power Grab by Radical Pro-Unionists

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) contends that President Obama’s chief of staff, Bill Daley, threatened and made coercive statements against Boeing employees.

You haven’t heard about these charges?

Daley was on Boeing’s board of directors when the company unanimously decided to open up a second assembly line for the 787 Dreamliner in Charleston, S.C. The NLRB argues this illegally violated the rights of Boeing’s unionized employees. The complaint against Boeing thus implicates Daley in any supposed wrongdoing — although the mainstream media has avoided mentioning this.

Of course, anyone familiar with the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) will tell you that the NLRB’s charges have no merit. Daley would have never got past White House vetting otherwise.

In short, Boeing made a legal business decision that unions opposed, and the NLRB is using this as a pretext to unlawfully expand its power.

Read the rest of this article at Pajamas Media.

Johnson & Johnson’s Sales of Cancer-Causing Birth Control Pills Comparable to Tobacco Industry’s Corporate Greed, Says Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

“Real hatred of women involves their exploitation through sales of cancer-causing hormonal contraceptive steroids,” Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer.

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer condemns Johnson & Johnson’s and its shareholders’ decision to continue selling cancer-causing birth control pills to young women instead of protecting their lives and striving to reduce breast cancer rates.

On April 28, 2011, Dr. Chris Kahlenborn, a medical adviser for the Coalition, presented a resolution at a shareholder’s meeting on behalf of a shareholder, Human Life International. The resolution proposed a change in J&J’s policy – that it would not discriminate in employment against breast cancer survivors, including those voicing opposition to the sale of the pill. Shareholders rejected the proposal after J&J’s board sent a message saying they “did not believe the resolution is necessary.”

World Health Organization scientists’ research and a meta-analysis in Mayo Clinic Proceedings show the pill is associated with cancers. [1,2] Use of the pill has been linked to the deadly triple-negative breast cancer. [3]

Kahlenborn’s testimony is available here.

“Over 260,000 American women will be diagnosed with breast cancer (in situ and invasive cases) this year,” said Mrs. Malec. “J&J’s corporate greed is comparable to that of the tobacco industry. How does J&J CEO William Weldon sleep at night?”

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer is an international women’s organization founded to protect the health and save the lives of women by educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer.

References

1. Cogliano V, Grosse Y, Baan R, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F. Carcinogenicity of combined oestrogen-progestagen contraceptives and menopausal treatment. Lancet Oncology 2005;6:552-553.

2. Kahlenborn C, Modugno F. Potter D, Severs W. Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2006;81(10):1290-1302. Available at: .

3. Dolle J, Daling J, White E, Brinton L, Doody D, et al. Risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer in women under the age of 45 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(4)1157-1166. Available at: http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/download/Abortion_Breast_Cancer_Epid_Bio_Prev_2009.pdf

NSBA Survey on Small Business and Taxes

The National Small Business Association (NSBA) released the 2011 Small Business Taxation Survey. This survey provides detailed insight on how America’s small-business community is being impacted by federal taxes. In short: complexity and inconsistency with the tax code are depleting small businesses of their time and money merely so they can handle the administration of federal taxes.

“One in three small-business owners spends two full work weeks every year dealing with federal taxes, and the overwhelming majority (87 percent) are forced to pay an outside accountant or other tax return preparer,” stated Larry Nannis, CPA, NSBA chair and shareholder at Levine, Katz, Nannis + Solomon, P.C. “The federal tax code is a massive resource drain for small businesses.”

Payroll taxes were ranked the most burdensome taxes—both financially and administratively—for small businesses. Only 44 percent of small businesses report using an external payroll company, and even those that do report a significant amount of time dedicated to dealing with payroll taxes.

Given the relatively high number of small businesses that handle payroll internally, it’s no wonder that the majority (63 percent) said the new W2 reporting requirement, beginning in 2012 that will require employers to report health care spending, will have a negative impact on their business.

Compounding matters, IRS audits of small businesses and funding for enforcement activities continue to rise despite new research that shows the IRS misappropriated an undue responsibility of the tax gap upon the small-business community. Illustrating this growing fear and mistrust small-business owners have for the IRS, less than half (47 percent) of eligible small-business owners utilize the home office deduction, primarily due to concerns it will “red-flag” their return for an audit.

“The time for a serious debate on broad tax reform is now,” stated NSBA President Todd McCracken “The ever-growing patchwork of credits, deductions, tax hikes and sunset dates is a roller coaster ride without the slightest indication of what’s around the next corner. This is unsustainable and unacceptable.”

Given that 83 percent of small businesses are pass-through entities and pay business taxes at the individual income level, the majority support proposals that would reduce the corporate AND income tax rates and eliminate certain deductions, as well as sweeping reform in-line with the Fair Tax.

Organic Groups, Farmers File Preemptive Lawsuit Against Monsanto

By Ethan A. Huff

In order to avoid completely losing their businesses and livelihoods to the predatory business model of Monsanto, 60 family farmers, seed businesses and organic agricultural organizations have collectively filed a preemptive lawsuit against the multinational biotechnology giant. Filed by the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) on behalf of the plaintiffs, the suit seeks judicial protection against the inevitable lawsuits Monsanto will file against non-GM and organic farmers when its genetically-modified (GM) seeds and other materials contaminate their fields.

In the past, Monsanto has successfully sued farmers in both the US and Canada for allegedly violating patent protections. But the truth is that Monsanto’s seeds or other genetic materials have inadvertently trespassed on nearby crop fields, for which any rational person can see makes Monsanto the violator. But Monsanto has someone been able to twist this before the courts to claim that the owners of the contaminated fields were guilty of patent infringement — and shockingly, Monsanto has actually won numerous cases on this illegitimate platform (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.ph…).

With the recent deregulation of GM alfalfa — and many more GM crops soon on the way — organic farmers and the organizations that represent and fight for them can see the coming storm. If given free reign over agriculture, Monsanto and its “Frankenseeds” will eventually take over the whole of agriculture — and this is a fact. So the plaintiffs are doing the only thing they can, which is to take proactive steps now to protect non-GM and organic agriculture from being completely destroyed by Monsanto.

“Some say transgenic seed can coexist with organic seed, but history tells us that’s not possible, and it’s actually in Monsanto’s financial interest to eliminate organic seed so that they can have a total monopoly over our food supply,” said Dan Ravicher, Executive Director of PUBPAT. “Monsanto is the same chemical company that previously brought us Agent Orange, DDT, PCB’s and other toxins, which they said were safe, but we know are not. Now Monsanto says transgenic seed is safe, but evidence clearly shows it is not.”

Over 270,000 members are represented as plaintiffs in the case, and thousands of them are certified organic family farmers. The case, Organic Seed Growers & Trade Association, et al. v. Monsanto, has been assigned to Judge Naomi Buchwald in a Manhattan, NY, federal district court. You can read a full copy of the suit here:
http://www.pubpat.org/assets/files/…

“None of Monsanto’s original promises regarding genetically modified seeds have come true after 15 years of wide adoption by commodity farmers. Rather than increased yields or less chemical usage, farmers are facing more crop diseases, an onslaught of herbicide-resistant superweeds, and increased costs from additional herbicide application,” said David Murphy, founder and Executive Director of Food Democracy Now!

“Even more appalling is the fact that Monsanto’s patented genes can blow onto another farmer’s fields and that farmer not only loses significant revenue in the market but is frequently exposed to legal action against them by Monsanto’s team of belligerent lawyers. Crop biotechnology has been a miserable failure economically and biologically and now threatens to undermine the basic freedoms that farmers and consumers have enjoyed in our constitutional democracy.”

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031922_Monsanto_lawsuit.html

Driving Job Away From Ohio

By Jeff Putman

Just when I was beginning to think that Gov Kasich might be not a RINO after all (supporting SB-5), he goes and appoints Jim Leftwich to head up the Ohio Department Of Development.

Leftwich is a leftist in more than just name only. As head of the Dayton Development Coalition, he maintained a policy of making the Dayton area economy COMPLETELY dependent on federal spending. Substantial amounts of DDC money have been spent on DC lobbyists. Read that again. Your Ohio tax dollars are being used to pay DC lobbyists!

A year ago, on WHIO radio, DDC said that they were surprised to learn that no other economic development agency in the country was doing anything like that. They had just always assumed that hiring lobbyists is the normal way
that everyone does business. It had never occurred to them that anyone might see anything questionable about it.

Leftwich populated DDC with mindless yes men who, with cult-like obedience, carried out a policy whose legality is questionable at best. Good managers hire people who think for themselves, who offer their insights and contribute
to everyone’s understanding. Leftwich, who before joining DDC, spent his career with the federal government being trained to systematically eliminate anyone who dares to think for himself. Such people are condemned as “not team
players.”

The “entrepreneurial development” side of DDC is also devoted to federal dependency. All of the entrepreneurs they assist are federal government contractors. Entrepreneurs that go to DDC with proposals to make products for
sale to the general public are ignored.

Where is this policy leading us? Where will the federal government get the money to pay all these contractors if there’s no civilian economy left? Where will the parasite get its food after it’s sucked its host dry?

DDC has ignored dozens of new products that could have been in production by now. Thousands of new jobs could have been created. And now it looks like this policy is going to be implemented statewide. If you’re an entrepreneur who wants to help build Ohio’s civilian economy, don’t expect any help from ODOD. Myself, I’m looking to other states.

Mr. Parker needs to take a long look in the mirror

By John Mitchel

RE: “Civil service reform a must” by Phillip L. Parker, CEO, Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce, Dayton Daily News, B2B, March 27, 2011. I couldn’t agree more with the Ohio Metro Chambers of Commerce three specific civil service reforms that must occur to give state government the ability to rein in burgeoning personnel costs and to act as more efficient stewards of taxpayer investments (read taxes).

(1) Giving managers freedom to manage their employees, (2) Linking compensation to performance, and (3) Investing in workforce development would go a long way to make local and federal, as well as state governments more efficient. The private sector has pretty much figured this out with the notable exception of private not-for-profit corporations like the Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce, which is led by Mr. Parker.

Non-profits are a sort of hybrid between private corporations and public business entities; the main difference being that many not-for-profits like the Dayton Chamber’s Education and Improvement Foundation receive significant funding from the taxpayers through government grants, where truly private corporations do not. For example, according to the Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce Education and Public Improvement Foundation IRS Form 990* (Google “Form 990 finder”), the Foundation received over $1.25 million in government grants in 2008 accounting for more than 90 percent of that organization’s revenue that year.