Category Archives: health care

Sex Trafficking Revelations Prompt Noon Demonstration Outside Planned Parenthood

Human rights advocates will gather in the public right of way today outside the Planned Parenthood offices across nation and Ohio from Noon to 1 PM to hold a “Vigil for Victims” of underage sex trafficking. The vigil will raise awareness in the community about the recent undercover video investigation that caught Planned Parenthood red-handed in the act of aiding and abetting underage sex trafficking of girls as young as 14. The vigil will also call upon Congress to immediately strip Planned Parenthood of its $363 million in annual taxpayer funding.

The local vigils will join with other Vigils for Victims being held today outside Planned Parenthood offices nationwide to reveal the danger the organization poses to women and girls. These gatherings represent a massive grassroots response to the undercover sting operation that documented Planned Parenthood workers at multiple locations across several states assuring an undercover investigator posing as a pimp that the organization would secretly provide abortions and other sex services to underage victims of human trafficking, helping to facilitate their exploitation. More information about the coast-to-coast vigils can be found at: http://www.ExposePlannedParenthood.com/vigil

Federal law is clear: “Sex trafficking of minors is a federal crime and punishable by imprisonment for 10 years to life.” (18 U.S. Code 1591) Also, “any person who aids abets, or counsels a federal crime to be committed may be punished as if they had committed the crime themselves.” (18 U.S. Code 2)

The nearest Planned Parenthood Health Center is located in Fairborn.

Democratic Senators Ignore Their Constituents on Health Care

Posted by Jennifer Mesko

Eighteen Democratic senators continue to ignore the fact that their home states are so opposed to President Obama’s health care law that they have sued to block it from taking effect.

The U.S. Senate voted 47-51 Wednesday on repealing the massive health care law. Fifty Democrats and one Independent opposed the repeal, while all 47 Republicans supported it. Democrat Mark Warner of Virginia and Independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut missed the vote.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who forced a vote on the law by adding it as an amendment to another bill, said the battle is not over.

“We intend to continue the fight to repeal and replace ObamaCare with sensible reforms that would lower the cost of American health care,” he said in a video posted Wednesday.

The vote followed a federal court ruling Monday that struck down the law as unconstitutional. The Department of Justice will appeal the case — brought by 26 states — to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“I believe we are looking forward to a day when the Supreme Court says to Congress, ‘You went too far. You went beyond the Constitution of this great nation,’” Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., told The Wall Street Journal.

Sen. Bill Nelson, D., Fla., introduced legislation Wednesday that would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to bypass appeals courts and take up the case.

The 26 states that sued are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Florida, Indiana, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

Virginia and Oklahoma are suing separately.

Source: CitizenLink, Feb. 3, 2011

Myers’ Letter Urges Rep. Hackett to Support Healthcare Reform Bill HJR 2

February 7, 2011

Representative Hackett,

It is my understanding you have yet to sign on as a co-sponsor of H.J.R. 2, proposing to enact Section 21 of Article I of the Constitution of the State of Ohio to preserve the freedom of Ohioans to choose their health care and health care coverage.

It is my hope, along with many of your constituents in the 84th district that you will do so very soon. The Ohio Liberty Council, The Ohio Freedom Alliance and the several Liberty Groups in your district are ramping up to engage representatives to insure that Ohioans will remain free and not “forced” to purchase healthcare. It is my hope other constituents will also contact you to ask that you very quickly become a co-sponsor.

If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance please don’t hesitate to contact me. Thank you for representing the 84th district.

Sincerely,
Andy Myers
Policy Analyst
Ohio Freedom Alliance

Ohio Lawmakers Introduce Life Saving Legislation

The Viable Infants Protection Act (House Bill 78) was introduced by Representatives Uecker and Kristina Roegner. The Viable Infants Protection Act prohibits abortion after 20 weeks when the child is proved to be viable and can live outside the womb. Greene County Representatives Jarrod Martin and Roger Hackett are among its co-sponsors.

House Bill 79 was introduced by Representatives Danny Bubp and Joe Uecker and co-sponsored by Martin and Hackett. HB 79 excludes abortion coverage from the State Exchange created in the federal health care reform law. The Federal law includes a provision allowing states to opt out of abortion coverage.

A related bill would revise Ohio’s current Judicial Bypass for Parental Consent law. House Bill 63 will strengthen current law by requiring a “clear and convincing evidence” standard, requiring judges to specifically inquire about the minor’s understanding of the possible physical and emotional complications of an abortion, and requiring judges to question how much the minor has been prepped to respond to such questions.

Representatives Ron Young and Lynn Slaby sponsored HB 63 with Representatives Martin and Hackett among its numerous co-sponsors.

The Ohio Right to Life supports these life saving bills and asks Ohioans to support them as well. Visit the Ohio Right to Life website to find how. (http://www.ohiolife.org)

Senate Debates ObamaCare Repeal, Liberal Icon Errs, and Americans Want Autocratic Obamacare Repealed

Mainstream news reports of the U.S. Senate’s debate about repealing Obamacare showcased arguments of the two leaders Democrat Harry Reid and Republican Mitch McConnell. One of Reid’s arguments was that 80 percent of the people favored it.

What Reid didn’t mention was his source.

Was it his constituents back home?

It certainly was not the general U.S. voting population.

Since the Democrat-led Congress passed the mostly unread autocratic healthcare reform bill, all surveys/polls showed a majority of Americans want it repealed. Two main reasons: (1) It will harm the economy, and (2) it will force Americans to buy insurance and penalize those who do not.

If you don’t believe me, check out the following two on-line sources of polls:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law
http://www.pollingreport.com/health.htm

Those two polling website provide a history of poll data on the subject.

As you will discover, most Americans are not against making insurance cover people with pre-existing conditions or proving coverage for the poor and their children. They ARE against government telling them what they will purchase and not purchase. What they will consume and not consume.

Congressional Republicans offered health care reform legislation that included what most Americans claim should be included in health care insurance i.e., what was mentioned above. They only left out the core element of Obamacare, which is the sanctioned mandatory purchase of healthcare as defined by the federal government and fines or imprisonment for not doing so.

Senator Reid, it is true most Americans are for health care reform; they are just against your autocratic version. They don’t want to follow your iconic socialistic paternalism. Most American still want their inherent rights like freedom. Yes, they even want the right to consume what ever they choose or refuse.

Republicans Can Use Senate Rules to Force Vote

by Gary Palmer

Now that H.R. 2, the bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), passed the House of Representatives, the nation’s attention will turn to the Senate. If there is to be a repeal vote before the 2012 election, Republicans must be willing to use the rules of the Senate to force the issue.

When bills are passed by the House, they are sent to the Senate for consideration. When the bill is received, it is referred to a committee. Brian Darling, the director of government relations at The Heritage Foundation, recently explained in his blog that in order to force a Senate vote on the House bill, two procedural steps must be taken.

The first step is that a senator must use Senate Rule 14 to prevent H.R. 2 from being assigned to a committee in the Senate. Darling points out that once the repeal bill is assigned to a Senate committee, the Democrats still in the majority in the Senate will prevent a hearing and a vote to get it out of committee. However, with a letter or phone call to the party leader, any senator can invoke Rule 14 to hold H.R. 2 at the Senate desk. In effect, implementing this rule would bypass the committee process and put the bill directly on the Senate calendar.

This puts it in position for the Senate Majority Leader to begin debate at any time. Given that the Senate Majority Leader is Harry Reid (D-NV), it is almost certain that the bill will not be brought up for debate. In order to get the bill up, Republicans will have to initiate the second procedural step by invoking Senate Rule 22, the filibuster rule.

Under Rule 22, any senator who can get 16 other senators to sign a cloture petition would force a cloture vote to limit the delay of a pending matter. It is unlikely that 13 Democrat senators would be willing to vote with 47 Republicans to bring H.R. 2 up for debate and a vote because a cloture vote puts every senator on record, for or against repeal. The Republicans can continue to use Rule 22 to keep the issue front and center going into the 2012 election.

In the meantime, pressure to repeal continues to mount as more and more information about the scope and cost of the health care law reaches the public. There are currently 26 states that have filed suit in federal court to block the implementation of the individual mandate provision in the law that one federal judge has already ruled is unconstitutional. These efforts are peeling the veneer from a law that will exert unprecedented control over the lives of almost all Americans at a cost far greater than Obama and the Democrats told the American people at the time of its passage.

Now that the bill is law and people are seeing what is really in it and what it is going to cost, there is strong public opinion in favor of repealing the bill and starting over. While the first objective should be to repeal the government takeover of our health care system, the Republicans must also have a sensible and affordable health care reform bill to offer as an alternative.

Darling wrote, “At a minimum, Senators have the power to force a vote on full repeal of Obamacare if they have the will to do so.” By doing so, Republicans can make it clear that they are once again the party that stands for smaller government, fiscal discipline and respect for individual rights.

Gary Palmer is president of the Alabama Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit research and education organization dedicated to the preservation of free markets, limited government and strong families, which are indispensable to a prosperous society

The Health Care Joke Continues

By Mr. David Zanotti

This has to be a comedy. There is no other way to grasp the hysterical claims of those advocating, now defending the nationalized health care take over. Picture clowns with big red noses and giant floppy feet trying to sell a child a balloon. That’s about the size of it. You can only laugh. For example:

  • The Secretary of HHS is out front claiming hundreds of thousands of people will be thrown on the street and left for dead because of pre-existing conditions. Really? This is one problem that states have been successfully working to fix for years. Does the Secretary really think that Congress would roll back this progress or not pass a “replacement” bill to make sure the problem stays fixed.
  • The Secretary, who under this plan becomes one of the most powerful bureaucrats in American history, is certain that repealing this measure will cost billions. So how does the math on that one work? If the government doesn’t spend trillions of NEW money in a field they don’t belong — it will cost the government more money. Explain that one to your kids. Oh, we know the Administration’s logic on this one. There is just one problem: the only way you can cover more people and spend less money is to ration care.
  • A funny thing happened this week: The British Prime Minister is calling for an overhaul of the British Nationalized Health Care system. Great Britain desperately needs to break down their bureaucracy and bring Doctors and non-profits back into the center of health care services. Hmmm… that would be the exact opposite of the current American Administration plan.
  • And of course, the prize joke of the day: Some members are calling for hearings and amendments to the Republican repeal effort in the House. These are the same members who one year ago passed a 2200-page health care bill that would (and did) choke a few elephants. There were no substantive hearings because no one saw the bill until it was time to vote. No one read the bill then and most likely NO ONE has read the bill to this very day. So why would they want to start actually reading legislation now?

This whole thing would be a joke but for two real dangers. First, people will die because of all this clown-town drama in Washington, D.C. And if that isn’t horrid enough, we can already see this Administration playing the oldest, most corrupt game in politics. They are claiming they gave us something that we cannot live without and blaming their opponents for trying to take it away. The old “taking candy from the baby” strategy. The design of the Administration is to paint opponents as evil and hateful and willing to take the “precious” health care away from millions.

The truth is that dastardly deed has already been done. No one in the media or the Administration or most of the Congress has read the news or the bill. Thus they are as clueless as a circus clown — or just pretending to be.

From the American Policy Roundtable’s For the Common Good blog, January 18, 2011.

111th Congress Wrap-Up

By Rep. Steve Austria

As we embark on a new year, it is important to reflect on the many challenges our nation has faced and the lessons we can apply from the past year. Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives concluded its legislative business for the year with the passage of a two year extension of the Bush tax cuts and a continuing appropriations resolution to keep the government funded through March.

I continue to have serious concerns about the outrageous amount of government spending and look forward to the new Congress and the opportunity to begin addressing our fiscal and economic challenges. Below is a brief summary of the major legislative and policy issues that came before the 111th Congress.

Spending and Debt

Last year, our nation witnessed the passage of several pieces of sweeping and costly legislation that I opposed, including the $791 stimulus, the second half of the $700 “bailout” bill, and a $400 billion omnibus bill that included over 10,000 earmark projects. The runaway spending we witnessed last year, and that has continued this year with the passage of the $1 trillion government health care reform bill, is simply unsustainable. The national debt is now approaching $14 trillion with each American’s share currently surpassing $44,000. Yet Congress adjourned the 111th legislative session with the passage of yet another nearly $1 trillion appropriations measure to keep the government operating through March of next year.

Jobs and the Economy

Despite exorbitant government spending, we continue to experience unacceptably high levels of unemployment. Just this past month, unemployment rose to 9.8 percent.

Unfortunately, the past two years there were few legislative accomplishments to improve the lagging economy and high unemployment. Instead, we witnessed the opposite – with the passage of the so-called stimulus bill, unemployment rose from 8 percent to nearly 10 percent. One of the more pervasive shortcomings was Congress’s failure to enact a budget resolution or appropriations measure this year. Legislation was once again focused on short-sighted policies, including only temporary extensions of the Bush tax cuts and Medicare reimbursement for physicians.

In the absence of any meaningful, long-term action on these issues, we continue to perpetuate a climate of uncertainty with negative implications for all Americans from small businesses to farmers to families.

The Local Economy

While the nation’s economy continues to struggle, there has been substantial progress in helping our local area get back on track with the formation of the Blue Ribbon Commission and the creation of new missions at the Springfield Air National Guard Base.

The new missions will help support both the current National Air and Space Intelligence Center mission at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in addition to the Springfield Air National Guard Base.

The Blue Ribbon commission made substantive progress with its release of recommendations on how the community can enhance regional economic opportunities through partnerships with the business community, academia and government in the Dayton area. You can learn more about the commission by visiting my web site.

Health Care

After a year-long debate and a series of backroom deals, in March Democrats were able to garner the support they needed to pass the nearly $1 trillion health care bill into law. While I agree that we must find a way to lower health care costs and improve access to physicians, this new law equates to a massive government intrusion into our health care system. Many in Congress have called for the repeal of the portions of the bill that will limit health care options and increase pressure on financially strapped states.

What Lies Ahead

The conclusion of the 111th Congress, brings with it a new opportunity to curb the unprecedented spending that is endangering the future economic growth and prosperity of our nation. In 2011, we must be focused on less Washington spending, reducing our nation’s debt and most importantly, creating economic growth with new jobs.

As a newly appointed member of the House Appropriations Committee, I understand the difficult spending decisions that will need to be made as we seek to address these important issues. I look forward to addressing the challenges that lie ahead in the New Year.

“End-of-Life Consultation” Provision Being Implemented By U.S. Health & Human Services

By Daniel Downs

The LifeTree organization recently reported the U.S. Department of Health was implementing “death panels” measures under then newly passed Obamacare. The infamous Section 1233 of HR 3200 would have federalized voluntary end-of-life consultations, but the section was eventually dropped.

On 29 November, however, the Federal Register (page 73406) published a funding new rule for “voluntary” advance care planning consultations for Medicare and Medicaid patients.

A very enlightening analogy is LifeTree’s equivalence of the new regulation to so-called voluntary TSA pat-downs and full-body scans. It is like a thief asking you for money while pointing a gun at your head.

Some are trouble by the media’s failure to report the new ruling. However, silence of the part of the media is probably due to it similarity to current policy.

When my parent was in hospital, we were asked about living will. We were given information about making plans for emergencies and end-of-lie decisions.

LifeTree researchers are more concerned about the implementation of the other part of the original end-of-life consultation legislation that is already making its ways through Congress. The bill is called the “Advance Planning and Compassionate Care Act of 2009.” It was introduced by Democrats Earl Blaumer (OR) and David Rockefeller (WV) both proponents of assisted suicide. Blaumer is also an advocate of the health care rationing groups and process known as “Physician’s Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment” (POLST).

As explained by Ione Whitlock, POLST is similar to the current document based directive (living will) through which a person’s medical treatment preferences are stated and honored. Under POLST, the document serves the medical process of repetitive questioning by various health care givers. The process is rigged to pressure the patient and/or family toward accepting medical ethics committees’ goals. Those goals advance their policy about advanced illness and conditions as well as reducing inappropriate treatments (often life sustaining treatments).

Recent experience with my parent’s medical care seemed a lot like POLST. The seemingly endless questionnaires by all kinds of nurses, doctors, therapists, and other specialists were numbing. Each new treatment by a different specialist and each new place of care (even in the same hospital) were met with the same series of questions. The same things were asked over and over. What I’m not certain of is whether the goal was get us to accept a predetermined series of treatments–maybe in part. Maybe, it is a conditioning process for greater acceptance of the POLST legislation.

The bioethicists who devised the POLST Paradigm hyped the documents’ use as tools for dignity and autonomy. The documents do leave the door wide open to an “autonomous” decision to hasten death. Yet, POLST owes its existence more to Oregon’s experiment with health care rationing than it does to the state’s assisted suicide experiment, according to Whitlock.

Do you remember how Terri Shiavo’s life was ended by removing her feeding tube? That is the ultimate health care rationing measure under POLST.

The bottom-line is POLST facilitates not only assisted suicide but also imposed death. “It is also an effective cost containment device. It creates an illusion of ‘self-determination’ while fostering consensus ethics. In short, the POLST process rigs the system in favor of pressuring the patient and family [to choose death].”

Texas Doctors Sue ObamaCare

On Wednesday, a court in Tyler, Texas, heard a lawsuit against ObamaCare brought by two Texas-based doctor-owned hospitals. The doctors argue in the case that ObamaCare ends competition between doctor-owned hospitals and non-doctor-owned hospitals by stopping the growth of their facilities and banning any new doctor-owned facilities from opening. This means that the healthcare “reform” legislation pushed through Congress effectively favors one type of business over another, and even punishes doctors who have a financial stake in the success of their facilities. Should the doctors be unsuccessful in their lawsuit, ObamaCare will give patients less choice over their healthcare providers and medical facilities, and the lack of competition will drive up healthcare costs and decrease patient care.

This is just one of around 23 lawsuits against ObamaCare, including the lawsuit filed by 20 states to stop the federal mandate to buy healthcare and the increased cost to the states. The judge presiding over the states’ lawsuit said that he will rule by October 14.

Source: Liberty Watch, October 1, 2010