Category Archives: politics

Mayhem in the Making: A Political Circus, An Out-of-Control Government Bureaucracy, and a Distracted Populace

By John W. Whitehead

With less than eight months to go before the next presidential election, political chatter among the candidates is ramping up and serious political discourse is declining. All the while, the corrupt government machine is taking advantage of a populace distracted by the political theater to advance agendas that are completely at odds with the nation’s fiscal, legislative and constitutional priorities. Indeed, the process of voting and electing a new president has become little more than an expensive, sophisticated ruse designed to deceive us into thinking we actually have a say in what happens in our government. However, the sad fact is that the United States government has ballooned into an overreaching, out-of-control bureaucracy accountable to no one in particular—not Congress or the president and least of all the taxpayers.

Thus, while the candidates mug for the cameras, American taxpayers are being taken to the cleaners—a different kind of mugging, altogether—by government officials eager to placate their corporate benefactors. While the surveillance state is slowly being erected around us, our civil liberties are systemically being dismantled. While our government wages war after endless war abroad, the war on the American people—fought with sound cannons, tasers and drones—is entering its early stages. And while the partisan rancor over who will occupy the White House becomes more toxic with each passing day, the elephant in the room—what no one is talking about—is the fact that it doesn’t really matter who gets elected, because no matter how often we change out the resident of the Oval Office, the immense, intractable, implacable, bureaucratic colossus that is our federal government remains entrenched.

For a start, consider national defense spending, which enriches the military-industrial complex to the tune of $740 billion and routinely falls prey to corruption and mismanagement. Who could forget the ten C-17 cargo planes purchased by Congress at the urging of the defense industry for a whopping $2.4 billion, despite the fact that the Pentagon insisted it didn’t need them? Incredibly, although the U.S. constitutes only 5% of the world’s population, America boasts almost 50% of the world’s total military expenditure, spending more on the military than the next 19 biggest spending nations combined. In fact, the Pentagon spends more on war than all 50 states combined spend on health, education, welfare, and safety.

Then there’s the $4 trillion War on Terror, which has seen at least $31 billion (and as much as $60 billion or more) lost to waste and fraud by military contractors and other government officials. A classic example of this was the $300 million diesel power plant that was built in Afghanistan despite the fact that it wouldn’t be used regularly “because its fuel cost more than the Afghan government could afford to run it regularly.” Or the $4 million paid to Afghan contractors for paving a 17.5-mile road in Ghazni province, which only resulted in 2/3 of a mile of road being paved.

Our expanding military empire is bleeding the country dry at a rate of more than $15 billion a month (or $20 million an hour)—and that’s just what the government spends on foreign wars. That does not include the cost of maintaining and staffing the 1000-plus U.S. military bases spread around the globe. A government audit found that defense contractor Boeing has been massively overcharging taxpayers for mundane parts, resulting in tens of millions of dollars in overspending.

Pork barrel spending (the earmarking of outrageous sums of money in federal contracting in return for personal gain and campaign contributions) borders on the ludicrous. In 2010, for instance, the federal government gave the University of California at Santa Cruz $615,000 to digitize Grateful Dead memorabilia. Then there was the $246 million tax break for Hollywood movie producers to buy motion picture film. Most recently, an $11 million federal grant intended to help 400 low-income people in the Detroit area secure employment only ended up helping two people.

Government contracts for building privatized prison complexes have also become a lucrative business in recent years—what one journalist referred to as “caging humans for profit.” Immigrant detention centers are especially viewed as future goldmines for savvy investors. For example, GEO Group Inc. was paid $32 million to build a detention center for low-risk inmates in Karnes City, Texas. The prison boasts a salad bar, a library with Internet access, cable TV, an indoor gym with basketball courts, and soccer fields. GEO Group will also rake in roughly $15 million a year for running the prison. The detainees being held indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay just received a $750,000 soccer field to relieve their boredom, thanks to American taxpayers.

And then there’s the generally indulgent and overall excessive spending that goes along with a government lacking in oversight or accountability. A case in point, at the end of the Bush administration, government officials were still getting official portraits painted for upwards of $30,000. Donald Rumsfeld even got two separate portraits for his two stints as Secretary of Defense. State dinners at the White House, as lavish as they come, are estimated to run as high as half a million dollars per event. The invitations for these dinners are engraved, gold-embossed and hand-addressed by calligraphers. Wine served at these dinners has been estimated to cost taxpayers between $115-$399 per bottle. Not surprisingly, the White House refuses to disclose the price tag for these extravagant affairs.

This brings me back to the topic at hand—namely, that nothing taking place on Election Day or in the days leading up to it will limit or restrain this out-of-control bureaucracy or alleviate the suffering of the American people. What we are being treated to right now is a stage show, full of sound and fury, but in the end it is nothing more than well-choreographed entertainment for a populace struggling to survive.

Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org. Information about the Institute is available at www.rutherford.org.

Weighing in on Pre-Game Football Prayers at Texas High School, Rutherford Institute Advises Officials to Respect Student-Led Prayers

(El Paso, Texas) — In a letter to school officials at Bowie High School, which has come under fire recently for its tradition of having a pastor lead the football team in a pre-game prayer, John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, cautioned Bowie’s principal against ending all prayers before football games, particularly student-led prayers. As Whitehead pointed out, although the Establishment Clause limits government-sponsored religious speech, the First Amendment still fully protects student-led religious speech.

“Too often, the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is erroneously interpreted to mean freedom from religion, rather than freedom of religion,” said attorney Whitehead. “Those who subscribe to the notion that society should be free from religion tend to use the principle of a separation of church and state as a bludgeon to eradicate religion from the public sphere. On the other side are those, like The Rutherford Institute, who believe that the First Amendment provides for freedom of religion and that the so-called ‘wall of separation between Church and State’—a term coined by Thomas Jefferson—was intended to refer to a wall placed around the church in order to protect it from any government interference with its rights to religious freedom.”

School officials at Bowie High School, which is part of the El Paso Independent School District (EPISD), recently received a threatening letter from the Freedom from Religion Foundation, a Wisconsin-based organization claiming “to promote the constitutional principle of separation of state and church.” The group threatened Bowie with legal action unless the school ceases its practice of having a local pastor lead the football team in a pre-game prayer. The letter was reportedly prompted by a complaint arising over a 2010 YouTube video showing the Bowie High School football team in prayer.

Asked to weigh in on the matter by members of the community, constitutional attorney John Whitehead of The Rutherford Institute wrote a letter to Bowie High School’s principal, Dr. Jesus Chavez, explaining that while it is not easy navigating the waters between the First Amendment’s Free Speech/Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses, there are still viable options available to those who wish to exercise their First Amendment rights within the schoolhouse gates. In making his case for the legality of student-led prayers, Whitehead pointed to U. S. Supreme Court jurisprudence, as well as guidelines from the Department of Education on “Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools.” Quoting the Supreme Court’s ruling in Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Doe, Whitehead noted that”nothing in the Constitution prohibits any public school student from voluntarily praying at any time before, during, or after the schoolday.”

Louisiana Children and Louisiana Church Schools Are Not Caesars!

By Gene Mills

Gov. Bobby Jindal released the details of what the Wall Street Journal has called “the most significant and sweeping education reform in American history.”

The Constitutional charge answered in the Gov. Jindal Education Reform revisits the original goal of public education enumerated in Article 8 of the Louisiana Constitution: “The goal of the public educational system is to provide learning environments and experiences, at all stages of human development, that are humane, just, and designed to promote excellence in order that every individual may be afforded an equal opportunity to develop to his full potential.”

The moral imperative “to train a child in the way he should go” is respected in Gov. Jindal’s Education Package and answers, in part, the injustice of unequal opportunities. Dr. Wayne Grudem in Politics According to the Bible called “the permanent economic underclass, created by a lack of educational skills resulting in reduced earning capacity for life”—one of the greatest moral issues of our day!

Today, Louisiana spends $3.41 billion dollars on K-12 education, local government throws in another $2.5 billion and the Federal government adds to that equation with over $2 billion more. That’s nearly $9 billion spent annually to “educate” roughly 700,000 children, achieving the unfortunate 2011 ALEC national ranking of 49th in Achievement/Performance.

Gov. Jindal’s reform only addresses roughly $1 billion of the MFP that is directed toward currently failing schools. Forty-four percent of Louisiana public schools have received a D or F letter grade by operating a school where two-thirds of their students are at or below grade level.

To be certain, the breakdown of the traditional family is central to the educational predicament that Louisiana schools find themselves in. Reconciliation of the parent-child relationship, especially with regard to the “educational, moral, ethical, and religious training…and the discipline of the child” is foundational to any long-term solution.

For decades, educators of all varieties have heralded the need to involve and engage parents in their children’s education. Gov. Jindal’s Education Package finally proposes just that and more efficiently than any reform currently proposed.

Some voices, such as Melissa Flournoy of LA Budget Project, have echoed opposition. Central to their argument is the mistaken belief that “public financing of private education requires ‘accountability and testing’ similar to that which burdens the public system.” On the surface, that cry appears reasonable, but opposition and appearances are designed to redirect.

Accountability does exist in private sector education though: Parents decide success and failure in private education, and parents exercise their God given authority to direct the educational options for their child rather than an unrelated third party “expert” who specializes in systems. According to Gov. Jindal’s proposal, testing requirements exist too. Students who receive the scholarship program will be subject to the same LEAP test previous counterparts are subject to. The separation of children from state control is central to the individual success and the brilliance behind Gov. Jindal’s proposal!

Missing from the calls for “private–school accountability” is the moral reason why we are having this debate–the chronic failure of the current education system to fulfill its constitutional and moral responsibility to Louisiana children. Private education does not share its public counterpart’s history of decades of public funding, or perpetual shortfall. In fact, when a private school fails, it quickly liquidates and goes out of business.

When a public school fails, it gets a letter grade, a very recent development, a four- year grace period and time to organize its lobby, unions and some employees to obscure the “facts of their failure.” Unfortunately, when a school fails, the taxpayers don’t get a refund, parents don’t get zip code restrictions lifted, and the children still earn a 180-day sentence to keep appearing at their “failing” school.

I am of the impression that the cries for accountability and testing are a “poison pill” designed to cripple the Jindal education reform package. No church-run school would or should adopt the onerous and unproductive edicts, mandates, standards, test, philosophies, fees or red tape that so-called “accountability” imposes.

At worst this package of bills to some “big government bureaucrats” is a unique opportunity to pull a “hostile takeover” of religious and private education. The cry for “accountability” is misdirected. It is designed to stop “choice” or takeover private schools, but neither objective will receive the support of Louisiana’s faith community.

Gov. Jindal’s fact sheet spells out his plan. Lawmakers will be asked to consider the children not the systems of old.

  • The money follows the child.
  • The accountability and testing follows the money-directly to that child.
  • Private Institutes remain private.
  • Public education innovates to compete.
  • Gov. Jindal’s education plan is deserving of our support. It’s time for the opposition to stand down while parents, pastors and principled policy makers fix this mess.

    Gene Mills is president of Louisiana Family Forum, an organization committed to defending faith, freedom and the traditional family in the great state of Louisiana.

    UN Security Guards Confiscate Pro-Life Literature from Students

    By Wendy Wright

    (NEW YORK – C-FAM) Youth attending a UN conference on women’s issues this week say UN security officers confiscated their backpacks after discovering pro-life literature.

    The confiscated materials were petitions to “Stop Sexualizing Children,” and were connected to a UN approved workshop led this week by Dr. Miriam Grossman, a child psychiatrist and author of “You’re Teaching My Child What? A Physician Exposes the Lies of Sex Education and How They Harm Your Child.”

    The offending flyer announced a project called the “Girls Coalition to Protect the Health and Innocence of Children,” which is an ad hoc group that sponsored the Grossman event. At the panel, girls from China, Spain and Mexico launched a petition calling on UN agencies to “Stop Sexualizing Children.” They charge the UN’s promotion of “comprehensive sexuality education” is harmful to children.

    The young people insist they were not leafleting, which is forbidden on UN property, though it is routinely ignored. The young students left UN grounds to make more copies. Upon their return they were stopped by UN security.

    One of the students, Kalli Lawrence, said that the guards noticed the group’s distinctive green backpacks and then ordered the students to hand them over. “The guards had this confused, angry look on their faces,” she reported, “and they started telling all the security guards, ‘don’t let any of these yellow papers go through, just take them all and keep them.’”

    The green backpacks and literature were stored in lockers at a security checkpoint. Students and their teachers were allowed to retrieve some of the backpacks as they left UN property. According to teacher Jody Dunn, some of the backpacks were not returned, those that contained a pro-life documentary called “180”. Dunn then insisted and those backpacks were returned also.

    Pro-lifers have long felt the sting of selective enforcement of UN rules. Kali Lawrence said, “They didn’t stop anyone else that we could see passing out flyers.”

    Upon questioning by the Friday Fax, the security officer in charge at the time said guards don’t “target” items. He went on to say they were not allowed to discuss policies or procedures.

    Observers speculate that someone connected to Commission organizers complained to UN security. At the Cairo conference on Population and Development in 1994, without any evidence, former US Senator Timothy Wirth told UN security that a certain pro-lifer was a violent threat. The person was detained and deported.

    Alliance Defense Fund attorney Piero Tozzi told the Friday Fax, “The UN cannot censor speech it does not agree with. Both the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression and the Human Rights Committee have recently emphasized the need to protect this fundamental freedom. Why then is speech by respectful, clean cut kids on a topic vital to keeping young people healthy being censored at the UN?”

    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom . . . to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

    Wendy Wright is Interim Executive Director at the Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute, a New York and Washington DC-based research institute. Her article first appeared in the Friday Fax, an internet report published weekly by C-FAM and is republished here with permission.

    The Historical Reality of the Muslim Conquests

    By Raymond Ibrahim

    Because it is now almost axiomatic for American school textbooks to whitewash all things Islamic (see here for example), it may be useful to examine one of those aspects that are regularly distorted: the Muslim conquests.

    Few events of history are so well documented and attested to as are these conquests, which commenced soon after the death of the Muslim prophet Muhammad (632) and tapered off circa 750. Large swathes of the Old World—from the India in the east, to Spain in the west—were conquered and consolidated by the sword of Islam during this time.

    By the standards of history, the reality of these conquests is unassailable, for history proper concerns itself with primary sources; and the Islamic conquests are thoroughly documented. More importantly, the overwhelming majority of primary source materials we rely on do not come from non-Muslims, who might be accused of bias. Rather, the foremost historians bequeathing to posterity thousands of pages of source materials documenting the Islamic conquests were not only Muslims themselves; they were—and still are—regarded by today’s Muslims as pious and trustworthy scholars (generically, the ulema).

    Among the most authoritative books devoted to recounting the conquests are: Ibn Ishaq’s (d. 767) Sira (“Life of Muhammad”), the oldest biography of Muhammad; Waqidi’s (d. circa. 820) Maghazi (“Military Campaigns [of the Prophet]”); Baladhuri’s (d. 892) Futuh al-Buldan (“Conquests of the Nations”); and Tabari’s (d.923) multi-volume Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, (“History of Prophets and Kings”), which is 40 volumes in the English translation.

    Taken together, these accounts (which are primarily based on older accounts—oral and written—tracing back to Muhammad and his successors) provide what was once, and in the Muslim world still is, a famous story: that Allah had perfected religion (Islam) for all humanity; that he commanded his final prophet (Muhammad) and community (Muslims) to spread Islam to the world; and that the latter was/is to accept it either willingly or unwillingly (jihad).

    It should be noted that contemporary non-Muslim accounts further validate the facts of the conquests. The writings of the Christian bishop of Jerusalem Sophronius (d.638), for instance, or the chronicles of the Byzantine historian Theophanes (d.758), to name a couple, make clear that Muslims conquered much of what is today called the “Muslim world.”

    According to the Muslim historical tradition, the majority of non-Muslim peoples of the Old World, not desiring to submit to Islam or its laws (Sharia), fought back, though most were eventually defeated and subsumed.

    The first major conquest, renowned for its brutality, occurred in Arabia itself, immediately after Muhammad’s death in 632. Continue reading

    Top 10 Things About Ohio’s Demographic Changes and Immigration Politics

    Ohio experienced slow population growth over the past decade, with a growth rate of 1.6 percent from 2000 to 2010—far below the nationwide average of 9.7 percent. Yet this minimal growth rate concealed striking demographic changes. While Ohio’s white population has declined since 2000, Hispanic and African American populations in the state increased.

    See the facts below about how Ohio’s emerging communities of color significantly impact the state’s electoral landscape, and the economic obstacles they face.

    1. Latinos and African Americans propel Ohio’s population growth. From 2000 to 2010 the percent of Hispanics in the state increased by 1.2 percent to a total of 355,000 residents, and the percent of African Americans in the state grew by 0.7 percent. During these years, the percent of non-Hispanic white residents in the state declined by 2.9 percent. Hispanics accounted for an astonishing 55.9 percent of the state’s total growth from 2000 to 2009.

    2. People of color now make up a substantial portion of Ohio’s population. In 2010 close to 20 percent of the state’s population was nonwhite. In that year 12.2 percent of the state’s population was African American, 3.1 percent was Hispanic or Latino, 2.1 percent was of mixed race, and 1.7 percent was Asian American.

    3. One-quarter of Ohio’s children are nonwhite, meaning that these demographic shifts will become even more apparent as time goes on. In 2008, 23.2 percent of all children in the state were nonwhite. By 2010 nonwhite children were 25.7 percent of Ohio’s children.

    4. In 2008 the support of Ohio’s nonwhite voters helped then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) to narrowly defeat Arizona Sen. John McCain (R). Though only 46 percent of Ohio’s white voters cast their ballots for Sen. Obama in 2008, an overwhelming 97 percent of African American voters supported the future president. Nonwhite voters brought Sen. Obama a victory in the state’s tight race, where he beat Sen. McCain by just four votes.

    5. In such a competitive swing state, every vote counts. According to the Pew Research Center, there are 140,000 eligible Hispanic voters in Ohio—the 18th-largest Hispanic eligible-voter population nationally. In 2010 there were 897,000 eligible African American voters and 55,000 eligible Asian American voters in Ohio.

    6. Anti-immigrant bills are emerging in the state. In 2011 Butler County Sheriff Richard K. Jones, State Sen. Tim Grendell, and State Rep. Courtney Combs fought to place an Arizona-style anti-immigrant law on the ballot. Though support for the law polled at 45 percent while opposition polled at 35 percent, the law failed to meet the requirements needed to be placed on the ballot.

    7. On the other hand, one city in Ohio is actively recruiting Latino immigrants. Dayton, Ohio, which has been struck by decades of economic decline, started the “Welcome Dayton” campaign in 2011 that encourages immigrants to come and feel like a part of the community while they help pull the city out of its economic malaise by growing small business and building up neighborhoods that have been ignored for years.

    8. Ohio’s restrictive voting law creates new hurdles for voters, threatening to reduce already low voting levels among individuals of color. The omnibus elections law passed in 2011 makes voter registration more difficult by eliminating Ohio’s weeklong period of same-day voter registration, reducing the state’s in-person early voting period by two-thirds to 11 days from 35 days, and forbidding county election boards from sending out absentee ballots or return-paid absentee ballot applications. In 2010 only 43.4 percent of adult African American citizens, 29.3 percent of adult Hispanic citizens, and 38.5 percent of adult Asian American citizens voted in the 2010 election, compared to 45.9 percent of whites.

    9. Individuals of color in Ohio—particularly Hispanics and African Americans—face extreme economic hardship. In 2010 the median income levels of Hispanics and African Americans in Ohio were substantially lower than those of Asian Americans and non-Hispanic whites. The median income of African Americans in that year was $27,172, and the median income of Hispanics was $33,178. These levels are less than 70 percent of the median income in that year for non-Hispanic whites—$48,334—and slightly more than 50 percent of the median income of Asian Americans—$62,426. In 2007, a year when 11.9 percent of Ohio’s population was black, only 5.8 percent of firms in Ohio were black-owned.

    10. African Americans and Hispanics in Ohio are hit hard by unemployment. While Asian Americans in Ohio had an unemployment rate of only 4.1 percent in 2010—lower even than the 6.5 percent unemployment rate of whites—the Hispanic unemployment rate in that year was 9.2 percent. Unemployment rates for African Americans and individuals of mixed race were nearly twice as high as those of non-Hispanic whites in that year, at 12.7 percent and 12.2 percent respectively.

    Vanessa Cárdenas is the Director for Progress 2050 and Angela Maria Kelley is Vice President for Immigration Policy and Advocacy at the Center for American Progress.

    This article was published by the Center for American Progress (online)

    Corporate Tax Reform

    By Congressman Steve Austria

    As Washington struggles to come up with a jobs plan to help turn our economy around, last week, President Obama unveiled his proposed framework for corporate tax reform. While it acknowledged that the corporate tax rate is too high, this proposal fails to provide details or address the need for a comprehensive overhaul of the current tax code. Additionally, the president recently released his FY 2013 budget request, which did not call for lowering the individual or corporate tax rates and contained more of the same increased tax policies that have failed to put us on a track of economic recovery.

    Lowering the corporate tax rate to be more comparative internationally is a step in the right direction but our current tax code is outdated, overcomplicated, and in need of a reform that does not pick winners and losers in the marketplace. It’s estimated that American taxpayers spend over 7 billion hours a year trying to comply with the current filing requirements. Each year taxpayers scan through 60,000 pages and make difficult decisions to choose between calculations from tax credits or deductions. Our tax code is ridden with loopholes and unnecessary complexity that discourages saving and investing. We must simplify our tax code and cut the red tape to ensure a fair tax system for our working and middle class Americans. Congress needs to pass a tax reform package that will help create new jobs not hurt small businesses and hardworking families. Americans deserve a tax code that is simpler, fairer, and will enable U.S. businesses to compete with the rest of the world.

    Small businesses owners have cited the cumbersome tax code and uncertainty about the economy as main reasons they are not expanding and creating jobs. We need to work to provide permanent tax relief for our small businesses to give them the certainty they need to reasonably plan, invest and hire. Any real effort for tax reform must ensure small business tax rates are low and provide more certainty for our small business owners and our job creators.

    Xenia Republican Women’s Club Meeting March 12

    The Xenia Republican Women’s Club will hold its first regular meeting of the year on Monday, March 12, 7 p.m. at The Oaks Commons. The speaker will be Elaine Herrick who is a local political activist. She will discuss the importance of volunteerism between now and this fall election.

    For more information, contact Pauline Clark ar Pauline_Clark@ameritech.net.

    The World is Endorsing Ron Paul For President 2012

    [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jbTxbY6-Oo&w=560&h=315]

    What the next video for some additional perspective on Ron Paul’s statements about cutting military spending and increased spending on national defense.

    [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duhaz-WYl3k&w=560&h=315]

    Mike Dewine Backing Rick Santorum

    A few hours ago, I participated in a town hall meeting with Rick Santorum. Listening to his position on a host of questions and issues and perusing his campaign website Rick Santorum, my impression is this guy seems a lot like Ronald Reagan. I don’t think his acting either. His is a conservative Republican who policy statements in many ways resembles Reagans.

    The big surprise was learning Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine has been traveling and supporting Santorum. (Much like Constitutional Attorney Jay Sekulow endorsement of Mitt Romney). DeWine and Santorum served in the US Senate at the same time, which give more weight to Dewine’s insights into Santorum’s hard work, thoughful approach to issues, and consistency to his core values. Of course, Santorum faces Romney’s 12 to 1 spending efforts to win this election as well as the fact that Romney is getting much of his donation from wealthy donors to Santorum’s middle and lower income class donations.

    According to DeWine, the grassroot turn out is excited and people feel Santorum connects with them. Santorum is more like one of them.